Mass Psychology and Social History

Author:

Semechkin N.I.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Far Eastern Federal University

Abstract

Objectives. Analyze the historical process and in particular the movements of the masses not from the familiar for Russian researchers positions of famous Karl Marx’s thesis: “being determines consciousness”, but from the opposite point of view — social existence is determined by the state of public social consciousness, with the purpose to see how the transformation of social consciousness towards its decollectivization and demythologization, that creates shocking mental discomfort, generates mass social movements unconsciously seeking back in time, which predetermines the course of social history. Background. Naive-spontaneous “materialism” of ordinary consciousness, but, even more surprising, scientists’ psychologists, makes it difficult to understand the real determinants of human behavior, that is, the fact that in the basis of individual behavior, and public life, and history in general lies not politics, not economics, but social psychology, that, contrary to the well-known Lenin’s’ aphorism, politics and economics are a concentrated representation of psychology. Methodology. Theoretical analysis of socio-philosophical and psychological literature; comparative-historical analysis. Conclusions. Transformation of public consciousness initiates the creation of utopian projects oriented into the past. Utopias evoke powerful social movements of the masses, fascinated by the irrational idea of returning to the “golden age,” in paradise. Thus, the dynamics of social-historical processes are determined not by economics and politics, but by the logic of the transformation of the archaic collective consciousness in the course of its individualization and demythologization.

Publisher

Federal State-Financed Educational Institution of Higher Education Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Reference44 articles.

1. Avgustin Avrelii. Ispoved’ [Confession]. Moscow: Respublika, 1992. 335 p. (In Russ.).

2. Averintsev S.S. Dva rozhdeniya evropeiskogo ratsionalizma [Two births the European rationalism]. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of philosophy], 1989, no. 3, pp. 4—15. (In Russ.).

3. Akhiezer, A. S. Arkhaizatsiya v rossiiskom obshchestve kak metodologicheskaya problema [Arhaizacija in Russian society as a methodological problem]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social sciences and modernity], 2001, no. 2, pp. 89—100. (In Russ.).

4. Batkin L.M. Ital’yanskoe Vozrozhdenie v poiskakh individual’nosti [Italian Renaissance in search of individuality]. Moscow: Nauka,1989. 271 p. (In Russ.).

5. Bell D. Myatezh protiv sovremennosti [Revolt against Modernity]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological research], 1992, no. 5, pp. 105—111. (In Russ.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3