Effect of Managers Competencies on Employee Engagement-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Effect of Managers Competencies on Employee Engagement

Published:2024-04-10 Issue:1 Volume:15 Page:112-126
ISSN:2221-1527
Container-title:Social Psychology and Society
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Karpov A.B.¹^ORCID,Bazarov T.Y.²^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. NovaMedica LLC

2. Lomonosov Moscow State University

Abstract

Objective. Analysis of the connection between the level of development of managerial competencies of a manager and the involvement in the work of both himself and his subordinates. Background. Most managers of modern organizations pay considerable attention to managing employee engagement when working with personnel. One of the key factors influencing employee engagement is the immediate supervisor. It is important to determine the manager’s competencies, through the development of which it is possible to increase the involvement of employees at different levels in the organization. Study design. The work examined the relationship between the involvement of employees at different levels in the organization and the level of development of the competencies of their managers; and differences between executive and employee engagement. The presence and degree of relationships were determined using correlation analysis, and differences were determined by assessing the reliability of differences in mean values. Participants. Employees of the organization: 768 people (24,2% men, 75,8% women): 146 (19%) managers and 622 (81%) employees. Measurements. Methodology for assessing the competencies of managers “360 degrees” based on a corporate model of 8 management competencies; Anonymous engagement questionnaire Kicentric – Russian version. Results. The manager’s competencies “Understanding the Business”, “Result Orientation”, “Interaction” and “Development of Subordinates” contribute to the involvement of subordinates. “Leadership”, “Initiative”, “Business Understanding”, “Interaction” are also interconnected with the leader’s own involvement. “Planning” is an inverse relationship. It has been established that there are differences in the involvement of managers and employees. Сonclusions. There is a relationship between the involvement of employees and the manager with the level of development of his competencies: some competencies of managers are associated with high involvement of him and his employees, some with low. A connection was found between the levels of involvement of the manager and employees. Differences in some parameters of engagement between managers and employees were revealed.

Publisher

Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Link

https://psyjournals.ru/journals/sps/archive/2024_n1/Karpov_Bazarov.pdf

Reference22 articles.

1. Bazarov T.Yu., Karpov A.B. Faktory trudovoi motivatsii sovremennogo rabotnika (na primere rossiiskoi farmatsevticheskoi kompanii) [Factors of labor motivation of a modern employee (on the example of a Russian pharmaceutical company)]. Organizacionnaya psikhologya = Organizational psychology, 2020. 10, no. 1, pp. 106–120. (In Russ.).

2. Bezruchko P. Praktiki regulyarnogo menedzhmenta: Upravlenie ispolneniem, upravlenie komandoi [Regular management practices: Performance management, team management]. Moscow: Al'pina Pablisher, 2023. 368 p. (In Russ.).

3. Egorova A.A. Vovlechennye sotrudniki: kak sozdat' komandu, kotoraya rabotaet s polnoi otdachei i dostigaet vysokikh rezul'tatov [Engaged employees: how to create a team that works with full dedication and achieves high results]. Moscow: Eksmo, 2023. 336 p. (In Russ.).

4. Oehler K. Model’ vovlechennosti sotrudnikov Kincentric (Aon Hewitt) [Kincentric Employee Engagement Model (Aon Hewitt)], 2018. URL: https://axes.ru/articles/model-vovlechennosti-sotrudnikov-aon-hewitt/ (Accessed 22.08.2023).

5. Karpov A.B. Vovlechennost' v rabotu – pokazatel' trudovoi motivatsii sotrudnikov [Engagement in work is an indicator of employee motivation]. Sistemnaya psikhologiya i sotsiologiya = Systematic psychology and sociology, 2018. Vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 74–83. (In Russ.).