The Application of GeoPlanner in Local Development Management
-
Published:2023-12-12
Issue:4
Volume:22
Page:525-535
-
ISSN:2450-0771
-
Container-title:Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Administratio Locorum
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:ASPAL
Author:
Kazak JanORCID, Świąder Małgorzata, Arciniegas Gustavo, Aslanoğlu Rengin, Wascher Dirk, Chrobak Grzegorz
Abstract
Motives: Local development can be supported by GIS-based tools and many solutions are being developed. They can be helpful in supporting more sustainable decision-making processes in public administration and can be used by stakeholders taking part in shaping common space. However, many of these tools are not used by practitioners in their daily activities. Therefore, the added value of this research is to examine how local development might benefit from further implementation of GIS solutions.Aim: The aim of this study was to verify whether a model designed in ArcGIS GeoPlanner is considered a useful tool by local stakeholders (representatives of public authorities and NGOs), and which issues in local development could be potential areas of application of similar models.Results: The model was tested during a workshop focused on transforming the local food system of Wrocław, Poland. Most participants declared that they rarely use GIS-based tools (less than once a month) or that they do not use them at all; however, they were willing to incorporate these tools into their activities if they meet their needs. An ex-post evaluation revealed that the use of GeoPlanner can help strengthen a knowledge-based approach during social participation. Participants were eager to use different functionalities of GeoPlanner to modify land use structure guided by a real-time verification of indicator-based results. Finally, a too detailed model can also be perceived as not helpful in regional planning. The user-friendly interface of GeoPlanner helped users develop a shared understanding of urban systems and design action plans, and contributed to capacity building by local stakeholders and raising their awareness.
Publisher
Uniwersytet Warminsko-Mazurski
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Urban Studies,Transportation,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference33 articles.
1. Aggett, G., & McColl, C. (2006). Evaluating Decision Support Systems for PPGIS Applications. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 33(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1559/152304006777323163 2. Arciniegas, G., Wascher, D., Eyre, P., Sylla, M., Vicente- Vicente, J. L., Świąder, M., Unger, T., Prag, A. A., Lysák, M., Schafer, L. J., Welker, E., Sanz, E. S., & Henriksen, C. B. (2022). A participatory tool for assessing land footprint in city-region food systems – A case study from Metropolitan Copenhagen. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6. https://www. frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2022.846869 3. Bazan-Krzywoszańska, A., Mrówczynska, M., Skiba, M., & Sztubecka, M. (2017). Sustainable Urban Develop¬ment on the Example of the Housing Deveopment of Zielona Góra (Poland), as a Response to the Climate Policy of the European Union. Bridge of Knowledge – Your Knowledge Portal. https://doi.org/10.3846/ enviro.2017.119 4. Bazan-Krzywoszańska, A., Mrówczyńska, M., & Tront, S. (2019). GIS Technology, 3D Models and Mathematical Models as a Tool for Assessing Development Capabilities of Flood Risk Land to Make Arrange-ments of Municipal Planning Documents. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 20(1), 25–33. https://doi. org/10.12911/22998993/93866 5. Bieda, A., Bydłosz, J., Parzych, P., Pukanská, K., & Wójciak, E. (2020). 3D Technologies as the Future of Spatial Planning: The Example of Krakow. Geomatics and Environmental Engineering, 14(1). https://doi. org/10.7494/geom.2020.14.1.15
|
|