Abstract
The aim of this article is to critically analyze the binary concept of civic nations represented by the civic communities of Western Europe and ethnic groups living in Central and Eastern Europe. The works of Ernest Gellner and John Breuilly were selected for research because they have used the indicated concept in their texts, and have become an inspiration for many researchers of national issues. The former represents a deterministic trend of sociological inquiries, the latter – social constructivism. Due to the above, they are representative examples of academic reflection on national issues widespread in Western European thought. The research proposes to reject the binary model in which civil nations were characterized as rational and striving for consensus communities and ethnic groups as irrational communities striving for conflict. The analytical model characterizing nations as political and ethnic communities was proposed instead of it.
Publisher
Uniwersytet Warminsko-Mazurski
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities
Reference37 articles.
1. ANTONSICH, M. (2015), Nations and nationalism. In: Agnew, A. J. (ed.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Political Geography. Oxford, 297-310.
2. BÖHLER, J. (2018), Wojna domowa. Nowe spojrzenie na odrodzenie Polski. Kraków.
3. BORODZIEJ, W. | GÓRNY, M. (2018), Nasza wojna. Narody 1917-1923, T. II. Warszawa.
4. BREUILLY, J. (1996), The Formation of the First German Nation State, 1800-1871. Basingstoke.
5. BREUILLY, J. (2003), Was Prussian victory over Austria in 1866 inevitable? In: Modern History Students. 1 (9), 6-10.