Abstract
In recent years, the Russian concept of war has evolved significantly. Its aim is to seek a change in the global balance of power. The subject of discussion in this article is the issue of war in the Russian military doctrine, the specificity of the hybrid war, the probability of Russian military intervention, and the question of building strategic independence. The author used a complementary cognition paradigm that allows combining the process of cognition with the functions of science. The considerations focused on the activities related to the annexation of Crimea in 2014.The research presents the Russian perspective of contemporary armed conflict which examines the experience of the Russian armed forces and the particularity of modern military operations. The key elements of the hybrid war were identified and the basis of Russian strategic independence which the ruling elite, in fact, was striving to achieve, was indicated. From the Russian point of view with regard to the armed conflict, there is a conviction that it is necessary to comprehensively use military, political and economic information as well as asymmetric actions. Russia is systematically rebuilding its armed forces since it has ambitions to play a significant role in the international environment; and the armed forces facilitate: articulating its opinions, deterring, and demonstrating its importance.
Publisher
Uniwersytet Warminsko-Mazurski
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities
Reference29 articles.
1. Abakumov, S. A. (2005), Ot Grazhdanskogo foruma do sozdaniya Obshchestvennoy palaty RF (2001-2005). Moskva. [Абакумов, С. А. (2005), От Гражданского форума до создания Общественной палаты РФ (2001-2005). Москва.]
2. Aburamoto, M. (2019), The Politics of Anti-Corruption Campaigns in Putin’s Russia: Power, Opposition, and the All Russia People’s Front. In: Europe-Asia Studies. 71(3), 408-425.
3. Anisimov, I. V. | Nolev, Ye. V. (2019), ONF v Respublike Buryatiya: uchastiye grazhdanskogo obshchestva v realizatsii vazhneyshikh napravleniy gosudarstvennoy politiki. W: Vlast’. 6, 167-171. [Анисимов, И. В. | Нолев, Е. В. (2019), ОНФ в Республике Бурятия: участие гражданского общества в реализации важнейших направлений государственной политики. W: Власть. 6, 167-171.]
4. Bäcker, R. | Rak, J. (2019). Epigonic Totalitarianism in Russia. W: Politeja. 5(62), 7-19.
5. Czachor, R. (2020), „Suwerenna demokracja”: geneza, treść, krytyka współczesnej rosyjskiej myśli polityczno-prawnej. W: Studia nad Autorytaryzmem i Totalitaryzmem. 42(3), 47-69.