Abstract
Motives: Agricultural sector in Ethiopia is characterized by its poor performance, despite the livelihoods of the large population of the country depends on agriculture. Sesame is an important cash crop and plays vital role in the livelihood of many people in Ethiopia. However a number of challenges hindered the development of sesame sector along with the productivity.
Aim: This study attempted to analyze production efficiency of sesame producers in Bench Maji Zone of Southwest Ethiopia. The study used both primary and secondary data sources. Purposive sampling techniques were employed to draw 270 sesame producer farm households. Descriptive statistics and econometric models were used to analyze the data.
Results: The estimated stochastic production frontier model indicated that input variables such as inorganic fertilizer, sesame seed, oxen power, labor and chemicals found to be important factors in increasing the level of sesame output in the study area. The result further revealed significant differences in production efficiency among sesame growing farmers in the study area. Applying the Cobb-Douglas functional form the average, technical, allocative and economic efficiencies found are 50.72%, 86.83% and 44.2% for sesame producers, respectively. Also among fourteen variables used in the analysis of determinants, experience in sesame farming, education level, farm income, total cultivated land, social responsibility, frequency of extension contact, participation in off/nonfarm activities, credit, proximity to market and soil fertility were found to be significant sources of technical, allocative and economic inefficiencies of sesame producer farmers. Strengthening education, extension service, credit access at affordable interest rate and accessibility of transport services and motivating farm household to participate different training as well as their experience sharing with other sesame producing farmers improve productivity of sesame production. Therefore, those important socioeconomic and institutional factors which are mentioned above must take into account to improve the productivity of sesame in the study area.
Publisher
Uniwersytet Warminsko-Mazurski
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Urban Studies,Transportation,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference41 articles.
1. Abebe, N.T. (2016). Review of sesame value chain in Ethiopia. International Journal of African and Asian Studies, 19, pp. 36–47. https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JAAS/article/view/29286/30075, date: 05.01.2017.
2. Abu, G.A., Ater, P.I., Abah, D. (2012). Profit efficiency among sesame farmers in Nasarawa State, Nigeria. Current Research Journal of Social Sciences, 4(4), pp. 261–268. https://maxwellsci.com, date: 30.07.2012.
3. Alemu, D., Meijerink, W.G. (2010). Sesame traders and the ECX: An overview with focus on transaction costs and risks, VC4PPD report #8, Addis Ababa. https:// www.wur.nl/upload_mm/4/1/8/73de144c-a-7e6-45cd-8374-746b25526cc7_Report_8_Alemu__Meijerink_0707102.pdf, date: 25.02.2017.
4. Arega, D., Rashid, M.H. (2005). The efficiency of traditional and hybrid maize production in eastern Ethiopia: An extended efficiency decomposition approach. Journal of African Economics, 15, pp. 91–116. doi:10.1093/jae/eji017.
5. Battese, G.E., Coelli, T. (1995). A model of technical efficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production functions for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20(2), pp. 325–332. doi:10.1007/BF01205442.