Comparative analysis of the results of surgical and radiation treatment of stage I kidney cancer

Author:

Sabelnikova Zh. Е.1ORCID,Sarycheva М. М.2ORCID,Mozerova Е. Ya.2ORCID,Vazhenin А. V.3ORCID,Lozhkov А. А.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Center of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine

2. Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Center of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine; South-Ural State Medical University

3. South-Ural State Medical University

Abstract

   Purpose of the study: To conduct a comparative assessment of the results of surgical and radiation treatment of patients with stage I renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in terms of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local control and changes in renal function.   Material and methods: From 2011 to 2022 170 patients with stage I RCC were treated at the Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Center of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine. We conducted a retrospective study of their treatment results. The first group — 115 patients who underwent surgical treatment of T1N0M0 kidney cancer (mainly in the amount of kidney resection — 85 people), the second group — 55 patients with verified T1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma who underwent stereotactic radiation therapy (SBRT) up to 30–45 Gy in 3 fractions using CyberKnife. SBRT was performed mainly for the treatment of a primary kidney tumor, in 7 cases — for a recurrence of kidney cancer, including 1 patient with recurrent tumors in both kidneys. The average age of patients in the surgery group was 73 years, in the SBRT group — 69.9 years. The average tumor diameter in the operation group was 4.3 cm, in the SBRT group it was 3.5 cm.   Results: The median OS in the surgery group was 121 months, but it was not achieved in the SBRT group, since most patients are alive at the time of the study. 1‑year OS in the surgery group and SBRT was comparable (98.9 % and 95.1 %, respectively), but 5‑year OS in the surgery group was significantly higher — 90.2 % vs. 70 % in the SBRT group (p < 0.05). The same trend was noted in the assessment of PFS. In the surgery group, 4 patients out of 115 (3.5 %) had a recurrence in the tumor bed, in all cases after kidney resection, after 28 months in average. In the SBRT group, 42 patients (75 %) according to RECIST 1.1 criteria 6 months after SBRT showed stabilization of the process, in 20 % of cases (11 patients) — a partial response, in 5 % (3 patients) — progressed disease. 1‑year local control was 96.4 %, 1‑year cancer‑specific survival in both groups was 100 %. Renal toxicity was recorded in 38 patients (33 %) in the surgery group and in 10 patients (18 %) in the radiotherapy group 6 months after treatment. On average, glomerular filtration rate decreased by 25 % in the surgery group and by 18 % in the radiotherapy group. We have not noted a single case of a pronounced decrease in GFR, which would require dialysis.   Conclusion: Surgery remains the main treatment option for T1N0M0 kidney cancer, but if there are contraindications to surgery, SBRT may be the best option for inoperable patients.

Publisher

Russian Society of Clinical Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3