Author:
Kushnir I. M.,Kolodiy G. V.,Murska S. D.,Semen I. S.,Berbeka U. Z.,Avdosieva I. K.
Abstract
Excessive and uncontrolled use of antibiotics commonly results in the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Therefore, the main aim of these studies was to determine the antibiotic susceptibility of microorganisms isolated from the pathological material.
The article describes the susceptibility of isolated strains to the following antibiotics: ampicillin, amoxicillin, oxacillin, ofloxacin, streptomycin, cefazolin, gentamicin, amikacin, amoxiclav, erythromycin, enrofloxacin, lincomycin, tetracycline, doxycycline, vancomycin, rifampicin, ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, tylosin, nitrofurantoin, polymyxin B.
During the study of six Escherichia coli and three Salmonella enteritidis strains, it was ascertained that they demonstrated different susceptibility to the studied antibiotics, in particular, only two E. coli isolates, which is 33,3 %, were resistant to streptomycin, 50 % of the isolated strains were susceptible.
When determining the susceptibility, it was established that all isolated E. coli isolates were resistant to cefazolin, vancomycin, oxacillin, and 83,3 % were resistant to amoxicillin, ampicillin, vancomycin, amoxiclav, rifampicin.
33,3 % of Salmonella enteritidis isolates were moderately susceptible to streptomycin, amoxicillin, and ampicillin, and 66,7 % were sensitive to ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, and enrofloxacin.
All isolated S. enteritidis strains were found to be resistant to cefazolin, tylosin, vancomycin, oxacillin, lincomycin, and erythromycin, 100 % susceptible to ciprofloxacin, amikacin, and ofloxacin and 68,7 % moderately susceptible to amoxicillin and gentamicin.
Publisher
State Scientific Research Control Institute of Veterinary Medicinal Products and Feed Additives
Reference8 articles.
1. Avdieieva, L.V., Polishchuk, O.I., Pokas, O.V. (2005). Metodolohichni pidkhody do vyznachennia chutlyvosti mikroorhanizmiv do antybiotykiv// Laboratorna diahnostyka. 3(33). 35-40. [in Ukraіnian].
2. Ihnatov, V.V. (2001). Epizootychnyi monitorynh infektsiinykh khvorob ptytsi. Veterynarna medytsyna Ukrainy. 6. 21-25. [in Ukraіnian].
3. Herman, V.V., Stehnii, B.T., Verbytskyi, P.I. et al. (2002). Dovidnyk z khvorob ptytsi Kh., 296. [in Ukraіnian].
4. Petrov, Y.F. (1988). Parazytotsenozy y assotsyatyvnіe bolezny s.-kh. zhyvotnиkh y ptytsі. L.: Ahropromyzdat. 147. [in Russian].
5. Polehenka, M.A. (2019). Analiz suchasnoho stanu vyrobnytstva produktsii ptakhivnytstva v Ukraini. Ekonomika ta derzhava. 3. 137–143. [in Ukraіnian].