1. For example, in 1957, the United Kingdom issued the report of the Departmental Committee on Homosexual Offences and Prostitution (often referred to as the Wolfenden report), its dual mandate suggesting an interpretive overlap between the issues at stake. Departmental Committee on Homosexual Offences and Prostitution, Report of the Committee on Homosexuality and Prostitution, by John Wolfenden (London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1957) at 247. In Canada, bawdy-house prohibitions have historically been applied against both gay men and sex workers, implying that the harms that flow from each are analogous. See J Stuart Russell, ‘The Offence of Keeping a Common Bawdy-House in Canadian Criminal Law’ (1982) 14 Ottawa L Rev 270 [Russell, ‘Offence of Keeping’]. See also Carolyn Strange & Tina Merrill Loo, Making Good: Law and Moral Regulation in Canada, 1867–1939 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1997).
2. Becki Ross, ‘Whorganizers and Gay Activists: Histories of Convergence, Contemporary Currents of Divergence, and the Promise of Non-Normative Futures’ in Elya M Durisin, Emily van der Meulen & Chris Bruckert, eds, Red Light Labour: Sex Work Regulation, Agency, and Resistance (Vancouver: UBC Press, 2018) 256 [Ross, ‘Whorganizers and Gay Activists’; Durisin, van der Meulen & Bruckert, Red Light Labour].
3. Brenda Cossman, Sexual Citizens: The Legal and Cultural Regulation of Sex and Belonging (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2007);
4. Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982, being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11.
5. Ibid.