Lessons about Motor Learning: How Is Motor Learning Taught in Physical Therapy Programmes Across Canada?

Abstract

Purpose: This article describes the content of and delivery methods for motor learning (ML) education and the attitudes and beliefs of instructors with regard to how ML is taught in Canadian physical therapy (PT) programmes. Method: A qualitative descriptive design was employed, using an online questionnaire and semi-structured telephone interviews. A descriptive content analysis was used to develop codes and themes. An online search of PT programme Web sites was conducted to supplement missing data and collect information from schools that did not participate in the online questionnaire or interview. Results: Eight individuals representing seven schools completed the questionnaire; six of the eight also completed the interview. Responses conveyed the fact that ML content was fairly consistent across schools and was predominantly situated in the neurological curriculum. Schools differed in the delivery methods used for clinical application of ML content. Respondents believed that ML underlies PT practice and should be integrated throughout the programme. Conclusion: Current instruction may deliver adequate ML content but may not provide optimal opportunities to apply ML principles in a clinical context. Continuing education emerged as one suggestion for remediating clinicians' knowledge–practice gap and facilitating student learning on placement. Only half the eligible PT schools participated, and all were English-language programmes; thus, the findings may not be generalizable to all Canadian programmes. Future work should explore how ML can be integrated into the PT curriculum to promote the application of ML principles across different fields. Students' perspectives on their understanding of ML and ML principles and self-efficacy for entry to practice should also be explored.