Should Delivery by Partial Ectogenesis Be Available on Request of the Pregnant Person?

Author:

Nelson Anna

Abstract

In this article I explore partial ectogenesis through the lens of choice in childbirth, framing it as a mode of delivery. In doing so, I refocus discussion about partial ectogenesis, ensuring that this centers upon the autonomy and rights of the birthing person—as the procedure required to facilitate external gestation will be performed upon their body. By drawing a critical comparison between “delivery by partial ectogenesis” and request cesarean sections, I argue that delivery by partial ectogenesis ought to be available on the basis of the pregnant person’s request alone.

Publisher

University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)

Subject

Philosophy,Health (social science),Gender Studies

Reference89 articles.

1. Abortion Act. 1967. ch. 87.

2. Ayuk, Paul. 2015. “Misinformation about Caesarean Sections.” BMJ (Letters). June 29. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h3489

3. Bates, Laura. 2016. “The Morning-After Pill is Safe. So Why Is It So Difficult to Access?” The Guardian, November 30. https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/womens-blog/2016/nov/30/the-morning-after-pill-is-safe-so-why-is-it-so-difficult-to-access

4. Judgements of non-compliance in pregnancy

5. Birthrights. 2018. “Report: Maternal Request Caesarean.” https://birthrights.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Final-Birthrights-MRCS-Report-2108-1.pdf

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3