Abstract
The 2004 Canadian Assisted Human Reproduction Act bans commercial contract pregnancy and egg provision, but Canadians undertake cross-border reproductive travel to access these services. Feminist bioethicists have argued that the ethical justification for enforcing the ban domestically, namely exploitation, grounds its extraterritorial enforcement. I raise an additional problem when Global Southern or low-income countries are destinations for travel: neocolonialism. Further, I argue that a ban on commercialized reproduction is problematic. Although well-suited to address neocolonial forces of exploitation and commodification, a ban reinforces neocolonialism by paying insufficient attention to the agency of gestational laborers and egg providers.
Publisher
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
Subject
Philosophy,Health(social science),Gender Studies
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The Postcolonial Paradox and Feminist Solidarity;A Transnational Feminist View of Surrogacy Biomarkets in India;2018
2. A Feminist Discourse on Surrogacy: Reproductive Rights and Justice Approach;A Transnational Feminist View of Surrogacy Biomarkets in India;2018