Female Genital Cutting (FGC): Who Defines Whose Culture as Unethical?

Author:

Onsongo Naomi

Abstract

Since its inception, the global female genital cutting (FGC) movement has been led by Westerners and framed along the lines of eradication. Unfortunately, the success of harm reduction strategies such as medicalization has been met with stiff opposition in favor of a rights-based framework of FGC eradication. In this paper, I join with others who have advocated for medicalization as beneficence. I question the Western paternalistic FGC eradication strategy and support the autonomy and empowerment of non-Western women in FGC-practicing communities.

Publisher

University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)

Subject

Philosophy,Health (social science),Gender Studies

Reference59 articles.

1. 28 Too Many. 2013. “Country Profile: FGM in Kenya.” http://28toomany.org/media/uploads/final_kenya_country_profile_may_2013.pdf

2. Problems with Criminalizing Female Genital Cutting

3. Labia reduction for non-therapeutic reasons vs. female genital mutilation: contradictions in law and practice in Britain

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3