The Making of a Company Colony: The Fur Trade War, the Colonial Office, and the Metamorphosis of the Hudson’s Bay Company

Author:

Bradford Tolly,Connors Rich

Abstract

This article argues that between 1810 and 1816 the Hudson’s Bay Company (hbc) underwent a managerial metamorphosis: where it had previously and then only timidly claimed economic privileges and authority in North America, after this period the company’s directors in London began staking claim to authority over legal, political, and even humanitarian affairs in the area covered by its charter, Rupert’s Land. Building on arguments that have been used to theorize the East India Company, this article concludes that in making these claims the hbc became what might be called a company colony, seeking to act as both a private business and a colonial government endowed with the power of the British state. In presenting this new interpretation of the hbc’s early nineteenth-century experiences, we challenge the persistent historiographical depiction of the hbc as a business-first organization operating outside the traditional patterns of the so-called Second British Empire, thereby offering a new way of understanding both the hbc and other British chartered trading companies during the nineteenth century.

Publisher

University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)

Subject

History

Reference92 articles.

1. We would like to thank Bethany McMillan and Mira Ahmad for their assistance with the research for this article; acknowledge the SSHRC Insight Development Grant program for its financial support of this project; and extend our appreciation to the journal’s anonymous reviewers for their perceptive suggestions about the article.

2. Few studies explore the motivations of the London Committee. When the committee is discussed it is generally argued that the HBC was driven by economic rather than social, political, or cultural goals. See for instance E.E. Rich, The History of the Hudson’s Bay Company, 1670–1870, 2 vols. (London: Hudson’s Bay Record Society, 1958); John S. Galbraith, The Hudson’s Bay Company as an Imperial Factor, 1821–1869 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1957); Glyndwr Williams, “The Hudson’s Bay Company and the Fur Trade: 1670–1870,” special issue, Beaver 341.2 (1983); Gary Spraakman, Management Accounting at the Hudson’s Bay Company: From Quill Pen to Digitization, Studies in the Development of Accounting Thought, vol. 17 (Bingley: Emerald Group, 2015); Michael Payne, “Fur Trade Historiography: Past Conditions, Present Circumstances and a Hint of Future Prospects,” in From Rupert’s Land to Canada, ed. R.C. Macleod, Gerhard J. Ens, and Theodore Binnema (Edmonton: University of Alberta Press, 2001), 3–22.

3. See for example Michael Wagner, The English Chartered Trading Companies, 1688-1763: Guns, Money and Lawyers (London: Routledge, 2018)

4. Ann M. Carlos and Stephen Nicholas, "Agency Problems in Early Chartered Companies: The Case of the Hudson's Bay Company," Journal of Economic History 50.4 (1990): 853-875.

5. E.E. Rich, The History of the Hudson’s Bay Company, 1670–1870, vol. 1 (London: Hudson’s Bay Record Society, 1958), 147, qtd. in Edward Cavanagh, “A Company with Sovereignty and Subjects of Its Own? The Case of the Hudson’s Bay Company, 1670–1763,” Canadian Journal of Law and Society 26.1 (2011): 27.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3