Factors Affecting Standing and Walking Outcomes for Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury during In-patient Rehabilitation: a Qualitative Study on the Perspectives of Physiotherapists

Author:

Seliman Merna12ORCID,Hong Julianne2,Gonzaga Kaitlyn3,Wolfe Dalton L12ORCID,Lemay Jean Francois45ORCID,Chase Andrea6ORCID,Walden Kristen7,Donkers Sarah J3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. From the: Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada;

2. Parkwood Institute Research, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada;

3. School of Rehabilitation Science, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada;

4. School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada;

5. CIUSSS du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada;

6. The Ottawa Hospital Réhabilitation Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada;

7. Praxis Spinal Cord Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Abstract

Purpose: Standing and walking outcomes following spinal cord injury (SCI) vary across rehabilitation centres and therapists. Much of this variation has been attributed to individual patient characteristics. However, insight from frontline health care providers, as well as exploration of comprehensive contributing factors, have been under investigated. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of physiotherapists on factors affecting standing and walking recovery and outcomes during in-patient SCI rehabilitation. Methods: An exploratory qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured focus group interviews. Our qualitative approach was grounded in interpretive description and used reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Ten physiotherapy representatives of seven different in-patient SCI rehabilitation sites across Canada participated. Dosage, organizational culture, length of stay, staffing, equipment, relationships, atmosphere, and mindset were the key factors identified. Our findings also highlight that how factors impact a site may differ, but perspectives on which factors influence standing and walking outcomes were similar. Factors beyond the individual and the relationship of these factors on training dosage were emphasized. Conclusion: Future work is needed to better understand the role of institutional culture, to design and implement potential ways to address key contributing factors, and to evaluate if such initiatives lead to improvements in standing and walking outcomes.

Publisher

University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3