Abstract
An important argument against removing donor anonymity is that such state-mandated policies might validate bionormative attitudes about the importance of genetic relatedness in families. Bionormative attitudes can be unjustly disparaging and harmful to a wide range of families including donor-conceived, adopted, and single-parent families. However, studies show that the majority of donor-conceived individuals want donor anonymity removed. This paper explores the question of how to weigh these desires for knowing the donor—which may be grounded in biased and bionormative assumptions—against the competing concern that removing donor anonymity perpetuates attitudes that may be harmful.
Publisher
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
Subject
Philosophy,Health (social science),Gender Studies
Reference41 articles.
1. Adoption Attitudes Survey. 2017. Conducted by Harris Poll on Behalf of the Dave Thomas Foundation for Adoption, February 2017. Accessed on February 1, 2022. https://www.davethomasfoundation.org/library/2017-adoption-attitudes-survey-us/
2. Donor identification 'kills gamete donation'? A response
3. Defining connections
4. Estimates of donated sperm use in the United States: National Survey of Family Growth 1995-2017
5. Offspring searching for their sperm donors: how family type shapes the process