The Doctrine of Theosis and the Reality of Purpose: Exploring the Convergence between Deification and Organismic Teleology

Author:

Leidenhag Mikael1

Affiliation:

1. Mikael Leidenhag is a science and theology editor of St. Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology, and a researcher at the School of Divinity, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Scotland.

Abstract

Theosis is gaining significant attention in theological research. This article argues that the doctrine of theosis, as it is portrayed in Eastern Orthodox theology, mediates a profoundly teleological vision of both humanity and creation. The telos of human nature and the wider world only makes sense in the light of God’s sovereign plan. Yet, modern science is on the whole reluctant to entertain any broader teleology within or for nature. This situation seems to produce a tension between a central component of Orthodox theology and contemporary science, evolutionary biology in particular. This article seeks to resolve this tension by exploring non-reductionist accounts of evolution, as well as the possibility of grounding teleology in the nature and functions of biological organisms. Thus, it also explores the conceptual shift from “mechanism” to “organism” in biological research. Moreover, as theosis locates the nature of humanity in the light of God’s broader purpose for the world, I make the concluding argument that Eastern Orthodoxy brings with it a well-needed realism regarding the epistemic limitations of the natural sciences.

Publisher

University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)

Subject

Religious studies

Reference73 articles.

1. Michael J. Christensen, “The Promise, Process, and Problem of Theosis,” in Partakers of the Divine Nature: The History and Development of Deification in the Christian Traditions, ed. Michael J. Christensen and Jeffrey A. Wittung (Grand Rapids, MI: Rosemont, 2007), 23–31, at 25 (original emphasis).

2. Ben C. Blackwell and Kris A. Miller, “Theosis and Theological Anthropology,” in The Ashgate Research Companion to Theological Anthropology, ed. Joshua R. Farris and Charles Taliaferro (Surrey: Ashgate, 2015), 303–317, at 315.

3. Stephen Finlan and Vladimir Kharlamov, “Introduction,” in Theosis: Deification in Christian Theology, ed. Stephen Finlan and Vladimir Kharlamov (Cambridge: James Clarke, 2006), 1–15, at 1.

4. Christensen, “Promise, Process, and Problem,” 25.

5. Christensen, “Promise, Process, and Problem,” 25.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3