Ambivalent Democracies. Uses and Misuses of Tocqueville Within the Abolitionist Debate (1839–1865)

Author:

Guerini Anna

Abstract

In this essay, I investigate the ways in which abolitionists and pro-slavery forces use Tocqueville before and during the Civil War, drawing on the major black and white abolitionist newspapers ( The Liberator, National Anti-Slavery Standard, The National Era, The North Star, and The Colored American). By focusing on the dissemination of Tocqueville’s ideas within a specific audience of white abolitionists, and on the impact of blacks’ criticism on this process, I challenge Tocqueville’s abolitionist arguments. Thus, using Tocqueville as a prism through which to discuss some of the key issues surrounding the abolitionist struggles, I show that the author’s reception depends on the relevance of these struggles and claims for the definition of democracy itself as an endless and potentially unmanageable process.

Publisher

University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3