Veterinarian Use of and Sentiment Regarding Standard of Care for Feline Ovarian Pedicle Tie

Author:

Herendeen Hillary A.1,Turner Jennifer W.C.2,Kreisler Rachael E.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Associate Professor of Shelter and Community Medicine, Midwestern University College of Veterinary Medicine, 19555 North 59th Avenue, Glendale, Arizona 85308 USA

2. College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, 1060 William Moore Dr, Raleigh, NC 27606 USA

3. Associate Professor of Shelter Medicine and Epidemiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Midwestern University College of Veterinary Medicine, 19555 North 59th Avenue, Glendale, Arizona, 85308 USA

Abstract

Ligation of the feline ovarian pedicle is commonly performed via autoligation (“pedicle tie”) by high-quality high-volume surgeons. It is not commonly taught in veterinary school, resulting in general practice veterinarians who are not comfortable with the technique, despite being faster than double ligation with suture, having very low risk of hemorrhage-related complications, and no increased risk for student surgeons. This study aimed to determine the use of and opinions regarding standard of care (SOC) related to the pedicle tie for feline ovariohysterectomy. An anonymous 23-question survey was targeted to private practice veterinarians via social media from September 2021 to November 2021. There were 142 respondents, with 77 indicating the use of the pedicle tie and 65 indicating no use. Of those who used the pedicle tie, most reported learning the technique from either a dedicated high-quality high-volume facility (32%) or a colleague/mentor (32%). Nearly half used it in all cases. They had used it for a median of 5 (IQ 3–8) years, and 99% were comfortable teaching the technique to others. Of those who did not use the pedicle tie, 60% reported that it meets SOC, 14% reported that it does not, and 26% reported that it sometimes meets SOC. Over half of the respondents reported using the pedicle tie. Absence from the veterinary curriculum was the most frequently cited reason for not using the technique. Few respondents believed that the technique did not meet SOC.

Publisher

University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3