Simulating Ovariohysterectomy: What Type of Practice Promotes Short- and Long-Term Skills Retention?

Author:

Hunt Julie A.1,Gilley Robert S.2,Gilley Alexandra3,Thompson R. Randall4,Anderson Stacy L.5

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Sciences and Professor of Veterinary Medicine, Lincoln Memorial University College of Veterinary Medicine, 6965 Cumberland Gap Pkwy, Harrogate TN 37752 USA

2. Small Animal Surgery, Lincoln Memorial University College of Veterinary Medicine, Harrogate, TN 37752 USA

3. Small Animal Internal Medicine, Lincoln Memorial University College of Veterinary Medicine, Harrogate, TN 37752 USA

4. Small Animal Surgery and DeBusk Veterinary Teaching Center Liaison, Lincoln Memorial University College of Veterinary Medicine, Harrogate, TN 37752 USA

5. Large Animal Surgery, Lincoln Memorial University College of Veterinary Medicine, 6965 Cumberland Gap Pkwy, Harrogate TN 37752 USA

Abstract

Simulation-based surgical training allows students to learn skills through deliberate practice without the patient risk and stress of operating on a live animal. This study sought to determine the ideal distribution of training sessions to improve short- and long-term retention of the skills necessary to perform a simulated ovariohysterectomy (OVH). Fourth-semester students ( n = 102) were enrolled. Students in the weekly instruction group ( n = 57) completed 10 hours of training on the OVH simulator, with sessions held at approximately weekly intervals. Students in the monthly instruction group ( n = 45) completed the same training with approximately monthly sessions. All students were assessed 1 week (short-term retention test) and 5 months following the last training session (long-term retention test). Students in the weekly instruction group scored higher on their short-term assessment than students in the monthly instruction group ( p < .001). However, students’ scores in the weekly instruction group underwent a significant decrease between their short- and long-term assessments ( p < .001), while the monthly group did not experience a decrease in scores ( p < .001). There was no difference in long-term assessment scores between weekly and monthly instruction groups. These findings suggest that if educators are seeking maximal performance at a single time point, scheduling instructional sessions on a weekly basis prior to that time would be superior to monthly sessions, but if educators are concerned with long-term retention of skills, scheduling sessions either on a weekly or monthly basis would accomplish that purpose.

Publisher

University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)

Subject

General Veterinary,Education,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3