Boutique Ultrasound: Love, Law, Medicine, and Consumption
-
Published:2019-08
Issue:2
Volume:12
Page:36-53
-
ISSN:1937-4585
-
Container-title:IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics
Abstract
Despite FDA recommendations against the practice, keepsake fetal imaging centers have become more common in the United States. U.S. ultrasound regulations construct keepsake imaging in relation to medical practice, yet these centers blur the boundary between medical and nonmedical. Analyzing keepsake imaging centers in two U.S. states demonstrates how centers both appeal to medical expertise to promote their services and extend an intensive mothering ideal to the prenatal stage. To understand keepsake ultrasound, we must account for the role of consumerism in creating pregnant mothers and how keepsake centers constitute ultrasound as a means of expressing mother-love before birth.
Publisher
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
Subject
Philosophy,Health(social science),Gender Studies
Reference72 articles.
1. AB 2360. 2006. “Lieu. Medical devices: Ultrasound.” California Assembly Bill. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=200520060AB2360
2. AETNA. 2019. “Ultrasound for Pregnancy.” Clinical Policy Bulletins. http://www.aetna.com/cpb/medical/data/100_199/0199.html
3. ACOG Committee Opinion #297
4. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2012. Keepsake Fetal Imaging. https://www.aium.org/officialStatements/31
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. #Headlesspreggos: challenging visual imaginaries of pregnancy and reproduction;Medical Humanities;2024-05-31
2. Cripping Reproduction;A Companion to the Anthropology of Reproductive Medicine and Technology;2023-09-20
3. Surrogacy;The Routledge Handbook of Anthropology and Reproduction;2021-09-16