Imagining Resilient Courts: from COVID-19 to the Future of Canada’s Court System

Author:

Matyas David1,Wills Peter2,Dewitt Barry3

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Law, King’s College, and Lauterpacht Centre for International Law, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

2. Faculty of Law, Wadham College, and Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

3. Department of Engineering & Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, and Medical Ethics Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has challenged an array of democratic institutions in complex and unprecedented ways. Little academic work, however, has considered the pandemic’s impact on Canada’s courts. This article aims to partially fill that gap by exploring the Canadian court system’s response to COVID-19 and the prospects for administering justice amid disasters, all through the lens of resilience. After taking a forensic look at how the court system has managed the challenges brought on by COVID-19, we argue that features of resilience such as self-organization, flexibility, learning, and reflexive planning can contribute to the administration of justice during future shocks. We propose that the business of judging during shocks can become more integral to the business as usual of court systems. Imagining such a resilient court can be a way to step from COVID-19 to the future of Canada’s court system.

Publisher

University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science

Reference248 articles.

1. Action Committee on Access to Justice on Civil and Family Matters. 2013. “Access to Civil & Family Justice: A Roadmap for Change.” At https://www.cfcj-fcjc.org/sites/default/files/docs/2013/AC_Report_English_Final.pdf.

2. Addario, F. 2021. “Attorney-General Doug Downey’s Regrettable Habit of Enabling Premier Doug Ford’s Worst Instincts.” Toronto Star, 15 June, Opinion section. At https://www.thestar.com/opinion/contributors/2021/06/15/attorney-general-doug-downeys-regrettable-habit-of-enabling-premier-doug-fords-worst-instincts.html.

3. Resilience and the impacts of hybrid courts

4. American Bar Association. 2007a. “Model Court Rule on Provision of Legal Services Following Determination of Major Disaster.” At https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/professional_responsibility/hundredfour.pdf.

5. American Bar Association. 2007b. “Rule of Law in Times of Major Disaster.” At https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/disaster/rol_in_times_of_disasters.pdf.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3