Faculty Perspectives Regarding Day One–Ready Examination Items

Author:

Shaver Stephanie L.,Patterson Coretta C.,Robbins Elizabeth A.,Hofmeister Erik H.

Abstract

The objective of this mixed-methods, cross-sectional study was to evaluate faculty perspectives regarding Day One–Ready (DOR) content on examination questions given to students at a veterinary medical college and to elucidate whether differing viewpoints on what information constitutes DOR knowledge exist among different veterinary disciplines. Twelve faculty members at a veterinary medical college from three different disciplines (small animal internal medicine, surgery, and primary care) reviewed examination questions given to veterinary students, answered the questions, and stated whether they tested DOR information. After elimination of items not answered by all respondents and after reviewing for question quality, 103 questions remained for analysis. An evaluator from each discipline participated in a discussion about DOR content. Of the questions, 30% were unanimously considered to assess DOR information. No association was found between type of question (medicine, surgery, uncategorized) and whether it was considered DOR. Primary care doctors assessed more questions as testing DOR information than either type of specialist. Questions answered correctly were more likely to be assessed as DOR. During discussion, themes identified with DOR information included common conditions, practical diagnostics, critical knowledge, and discriminating between differential diagnoses. Specialists and primary care doctors differed in their assessment of DOR questions. Veterinary faculty should carefully consider whether examination questions contain DOR information and are appropriate for testing knowledge of the entry-level veterinarian.

Publisher

University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)

Subject

General Veterinary,Education,General Medicine

Reference17 articles.

1. Competency-based medical education: theory to practice

2. Approaches to defining day-one competency: a framework for learning veterinary skills

3. 3Dicks MR, Bain B, Ouedraogo F, Knippenberg R, Hansen C. 2017 AVMA & AAVMC Report on the market for veterinary education [Internet]. Schaumburg (IL): American Veterinary Medical Association, Veterinary Economics Division

4. 2017 [cited 2018 May 21]. Available from: https://www.aavmc.org/assets/site_18/files/annual%20reports/avma%20market%20for%20veterinary%20education.pdf.

5. Subject Expertise and Teachers’ Knowledge

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3