The Stethoscope in 19th-Century American Practice: Ideas, Rhetoric, and Eventual Adoption

Author:

Reinhart Richard A.1

Affiliation:

1. Professor of Medicine Emeritus, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University

Abstract

The stethoscope was invented in 1816 by the French physician R.T.H. Laennec, who, after three years of clinical observations, published his treatise Mediate Auscultation in 1819. In his treatise, Laennec included details of his new method of using the stethoscope to provide physiological and pathological evaluation of patients. American physicians attended lectures and clinics at Paris hospitals and carried this information back to their respective medical schools and practices. This was accomplished by a relatively limited number of elite American physicians who were able to take advantage of travel abroad and whose practices were academically affiliated. However, it is a well-substantiated historical claim that the adoption of the stethoscope by most American physicians was slow. There are many reasons for slow adoption of the stethoscope in America, among which are lack of formal education, including bedside training in the stethoscope, complexity of interpretation of auscultatory information, hesitancy of the patient and physician to have an instrument placed between them, and lack of opportunities for continuing education for physicians after leaving medical school. As the nineteenth century progressed, scientific ideas and rhetoric related to auscultation and the stethoscope became more widespread, reflecting gradual acceptance and adoption of the stethoscope by American practitioners. In this article, I examine the ideas and rhetoric in medical journal articles, advertisements, and medical school textbooks to learn what was thought by physicians to be important in their practice. Advertisement of medical school curricula with mention of specific course work or lectures related to auscultation or the stethoscope is noted, reflecting increased interest in the stethoscope as an adjunct to physical examination. This information introduces evidence to test and bolster the existing historical claims of slow adoption of the stethoscope by addressing in more detail when and why adoption by American physicians became widespread.

Publisher

University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference76 articles.

1. René-Théophile-Hyacinthe Laënnec, De l’auscultation médiate, ou Traité du diagnostic des maladies des poumons et du cœur, fondé principalement sur ce nouveau moyen d’exploration (Paris: Chez J.A. Brosson et J.S. Chaudé, 1819).

2. “De l’Auscultation médiate; ou Traité du diagnostic des maladies des poumons et du Cœur, fondé principalement sur ce nouveau moyen d’exploration.” Medico-Chirurgical Journal 2 (1820):461–94; Saul Jarcho, “An Early Review of Laennec’s Treatise,” American Journal of Cardiology 9 (1962): 962–69.

3. Some of the many examples of publications by elite physicians on the stethoscope: Henry Bowditch, The Young Stethoscopist; or, the Student’s Aid to Auscultation (New York: Samuel S. and William Wood, 1848). Austin Flint, “The Life and Labors of Laennec: An Introductory Address Delivered at the New Orleans School of Medicine, 14 November 1859,” Medical News and Hospital Gazette 6 (1859): 736–56. S. Weir Mitchell, “The History of Instruments of Precision in Medicine: Being Part of an Address Delivered to the One Hundred and Fourteenth Course of Lectures at the Medical School of the University of Pennsylvania,” The Medical Record 14 (1878): 285–88.

4. Kenneth M. Ludmerer, Learning to Heal: The Development of American Medical Education (New York: Basic Books, 1985). John Harley Warner, Against the Spirit of the System: The French Impulse in Nineteenth-Century American Medicine (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998). Michael A. Flannery, "Review: Alfred Jay Bollet, Civil War Medicine: Challenges and Triumphs," Pharmacy in History 43 (2001): 150-52

5. W.F. Bynum, Science and the Practice of Medicine in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), among others noted throughout this article.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3