Affiliation:
1. Department of Family Environment Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011 U.S.A.
2. Department of Sociology and Anthropology , University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire 03824 U.S.A.
Abstract
This study provides a more thorough test of the reliability and validity of the “final say” measure of marital power than has been provided in previous studies, which have been inconclusive in their findings. The reliability and validity of conflict- weighted, importance-weighted and unweighted versions of the “final say” measure are compared, along with husbands’, wives’, and children’s responses. The data base is comprised of 5 samples gathered in the United States and India. The major findings produced through an alpha reliability analysis include : (1) the “final say” measure has cross-cultural validity, (2) weighting by conflict or importance does not influence validity or reliability of the measure, (3) husbands’ and wives’ responses have equivalent levels of validity and (4) older children’s responses are the most reliable, followed by those of wives and finally husbands. The results indicate that the “final say” measure is a more valid and reliable instrument than previous research has suggested.
Publisher
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Anthropology,Social Psychology
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献