Comparison of Accelerate PhenoTest BC Kit and MALDI-TOF MS/VITEK 2 System for the rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli causing bloodstream infections

Author:

Stokes William1ORCID,Campbell Lorraine2,Pitout Johann2345,Conly John146,Church Deirdre123,Gregson Dan123

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

2. Calgary Laboratory Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

3. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

4. Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

5. Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

6. Snyder Institute for Chronic Disease, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Abstract

Background: Our laboratory uses matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI) and the VITEK 2 system (DV2) directly from positive blood cultures (BC) for organism identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). Our objective was to compare direct MALDI–DV2 with a commercial BC ID–AST platform, the Accelerate Pheno system (AXDX), in the ID–AST of clinical and seeded BC positive for gram-negative bacilli (GNB). Methods: BC positive for GNB were collected over a 3-mo period and tested using AXDX and direct MALDI–DV2 and compared with conventional methods. A subset of sterile BC were seeded with multi-drug-resistant GNB. Results: Twenty-nine clinical samples and 35 seeded samples were analyzed. Direct MALDI had a higher ID failure rate (31.0%) than AXDX (3.4%; p < 0.001). Time to ID–AST was 1.5–6.9 h, 5.8–16.5 h, and 21.6–33.0 h for AXDX, direct MALDI–DV2, and conventional methods, respectively ( p < 0.001). For clinical samples, AXDX and DV2 had essential agreement (EA) or categorical agreement (CA) of more than 96%. For seeded samples, AXDX had EA, CA, VME, ME, and minor error (mE) of 93.2%, 89.0%, 2.2%, 0%, and 9.2%, respectively. AXDX had a large number of non-reports (6.1%) stemming from meropenem testing. DV2 had EA, CA, VME, ME, and mE of 97.5%, 94.7%, 1.3%, 0%, and 4.1%, respectively. Conclusions: Direct MALDI–DV2 and AXDX both had high agreement for clinical samples, but direct MALDI–DV2 had higher agreement when challenged with MDR GNB.

Publisher

University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3