Two rare variants that affect the same amino acid in CFTR have distinct responses to ivacaftor

Abstract

AbstractSome residues in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) channel are the site of more than one CFTR variant that cause cystic fibrosis. Here, we investigated the function of S1159F and S1159P, two variants associated with different clinical phenotypes, which affect the same pore‐lining residue in transmembrane segment 12 that are both strongly potentiated by ivacaftor when expressed in CFBE41o− bronchial epithelial cells. To study the single‐channel behaviour of CFTR, we applied the patch‐clamp technique to Chinese hamster ovary cells heterologously expressing CFTR variants incubated at 27°C to enhance channel residence at the plasma membrane. S1159F‐ and S1159P‐CFTR formed Cl− channels activated by cAMP‐dependent phosphorylation and gated by ATP that exhibited thermostability at 37°C. Both variants modestly reduced the single‐channel conductance of CFTR. By severely attenuating channel gating, S1159F‐ and S1159P‐CFTR reduced the open probability (Po) of wild‐type CFTR by ≥75% at ATP (1 mM); S1159F‐CFTR caused the greater decrease in Po consistent with its more severe clinical phenotype. Ivacaftor (10–100 nM) doubled the Po of both CFTR variants without restoring Po values to wild‐type levels, but concomitantly, ivacaftor decreased current flow through open channels. For S1159F‐CFTR, the reduction of current flow was marked at high (supersaturated) ivacaftor concentrations (0.5–1 μM) and voltage‐independent, identifying an additional detrimental action of elevated ivacaftor concentrations. In conclusion, S1159F and S1159P are gating variants, which also affect CFTR processing and conduction, but not stability, necessitating the use of combinations of CFTR modulators to optimally restore their channel activity. imageKey points Dysfunction of the ion channel cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) causes the genetic disease cystic fibrosis (CF). This study investigated two rare pathogenic CFTR variants, S1159F and S1159P, which affect the same amino acid in CFTR, to understand the molecular basis of disease and response to the CFTR‐targeted therapy ivacaftor. Both rare variants diminished CFTR function by modestly reducing current flow through the channel and severely inhibiting ATP‐dependent channel gating with S1159F exerting the stronger adverse effect, which correlates with its association with more severe disease. Ivacaftor potentiated channel gating by both rare variants without restoring their activity to wild‐type levels, but concurrently reduced current flow through open channels, particularly those of S1159F‐CFTR. Our data demonstrate that S1159F and S1159P cause CFTR dysfunction by multiple mechanisms that require combinations of CFTR‐targeted therapies to fully restore channel function.