The normal distribution of the hypoxic ventilatory response and methodological impacts: a meta‐analysis and computational investigation

Author:

Oeung Britney1,Pham Kathy1ORCID,Olfert I. Mark2,Zerda David J. De La3,Gaio Eduardo4ORCID,Powell Frank L.5ORCID,Heinrich Erica C.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Biomedical Sciences School of Medicine University of California Riverside CA USA

2. Department of Physiology & Pharmacology and Division of Exercise Physiology West Virginia University School of Medicine Morgantown WV USA

3. Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine University of Miami Coral Gables FL USA

4. School of Medicine Deakin University Geelong Australia

5. Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine University of California, San Diego La Jolla CA USA

Abstract

AbstractThe hypoxic ventilatory response (HVR) is the increase in breathing in response to reduced arterial oxygen pressure. Over several decades, studies have revealed substantial population‐level differences in the magnitude of the HVR as well as significant inter‐individual variation. In particular, low HVRs occur frequently in Andean high‐altitude native populations. However, our group conducted hundreds of HVR measures over several years and commonly observed low responses in sea‐level populations as well. As a result, we aimed to determine the normal HVR distribution, whether low responses were common, and to what extent variation in study protocols influence these findings. We conducted a comprehensive search of the literature and examined the distributions of HVR values across 78 studies that utilized step‐down/steady‐state or progressive hypoxia methods in untreated, healthy human subjects. Several studies included multiple datasets across different populations or experimental conditions. In the final analysis, 72 datasets reported mean HVR values and 60 datasets provided raw HVR datasets. Of the 60 datasets reporting raw HVR values, 35 (58.3%) were at least moderately positively skewed (skew > 0.5), and 21 (35%) were significantly positively skewed (skew > 1), indicating that lower HVR values are common. The skewness of HVR distributions does not appear to be an artifact of methodology or the unit with which the HVR is reported. Further analysis demonstrated that the use of step‐down hypoxia versus progressive hypoxia methods did not have a significant impact on average HVR values, but that isocapnic protocols produced higher HVRs than poikilocapnic protocols. This work provides a reference for expected HVR values and illustrates substantial inter‐individual variation in this key reflex. Finally, the prevalence of low HVRs in the general population provides insight into our understanding of blunted HVRs in high‐altitude adapted groups. imageKey points The hypoxic ventilatory response (HVR) plays a crucial role in determining an individual's predisposition to hypoxia‐related pathologies. There is notable variability in HVR sensitivity across individuals as well as significant population‐level differences. We report that the normal distribution of the HVR is positively skewed, with a significant prevalence of low HVR values amongst the general healthy population. We also find no significant impact of the experimental protocol used to induce hypoxia, although HVR is greater with isocapnic versus poikilocapnic methods. These results provide insight into the normal distribution of the HVR, which could be useful in clinical decisions of diseases related to hypoxaemia. Additionally, the low HVR values found within the general population provide insight into the genetic adaptations found in populations residing in high altitudes.

Funder

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Physiology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3