Distinct electrophysiological properties of long‐range GABAergic and glutamatergic neurons from the lateral amygdala to the auditory cortex of the mouse

Abstract

AbstractDifferentiating between auditory signals of various emotional significance plays a crucial role in an individual's ability to thrive and excel in social interactions and in survival. Multiple approaches, including anatomical studies, electrophysiological investigations, imaging techniques, optogenetics and chemogenetics, have confirmed that the auditory cortex (AC) impacts fear‐related behaviours driven by auditory stimuli by conveying auditory information to the lateral amygdala (LA) through long‐range excitatory glutamatergic and GABAergic connections. In addition, the LA provides glutamatergic projections to the AC which are important to fear memory expression and are modified by associative fear learning. Here we test the hypothesis that the LA also sends long‐range direct inhibitory inputs to the cortex. To address this fundamental question, we used anatomical and electrophysiological approaches, allowing us to directly assess the nature of GABAergic inputs from the LA to the AC in the mouse. Our findings elucidate the existence of a long‐range inhibitory pathway from the LA to the AC (LAC) via parvalbumin‐expressing (LAC‐Parv) and somatostatin‐expressing (LAC‐SOM) neurons. This research identifies distinct electrophysiological properties for genetically defined long‐range GABAergic neurons involved in the communication between the LA and the cortex (LAC‐Parv inhibitory projections → AC neurons; LAC‐Som inhibitory projections → AC neurons) within the lateral amygdala cortical network. imageKey points The mouse auditory cortex receives inputs from the lateral amygdala. Retrograde viral tracing techniques allowed us to identify two previously undescribed lateral amygdala to auditory cortex (LAC) GABAergic projecting neurons. Extensive electrophysiological, morphological and anatomical characterization of LAC neurons is provided here, demonstrating key differences in the three populations. This study paves the way for a better understanding of the growing complexity of the cortico‐amygdala‐cortico circuit.