Abstract
The war is still raging, but it is already clear that advance planning is needed to ensure survival and prepare for Ukraine's recovery from the destruction caused by Russian aggression. The damage and losses caused by the aggressor to Ukrainian regions amount to billions of dollars, which are already being received and will continue to be received in the form of international technical assistance, reparations, investments, etc. These funds will be distributed across the regions, taking into account the extent of their destruction, in the relevant areas (priorities). This process requires clear arguments from the government and local authorities on the targeting of both funds and priorities that characterise effectiveness. Therefore, there is a need to find effective tools for assessing the socio-economic efficiency of post-war reconstruction. Thus, the purpose of the article is to develop a methodological support for the distribution of territories according to their functional purpose and practical implementation of the assessment of socio-economic efficiency of post-war reconstruction of the country. The conceptual foundations of the proposals presented in the article are based on current legislation, general scientific methods of cognition, theoretical and empirical orientation. On the basis of the matrix method, a system of coordinates is built to distribute the regions of Ukraine by their functional type. The choice of individual indicators as the abscissa and ordinate axes is substantiated. By converting natural indicators into relative ones, the initial data for the distribution of regions by their functional type are formed. For the purpose of further comparison of data, the average value for each indicator and region in the dynamics for five years is calculated. The proposed approach allows for a substantive approach to determining the priorities of post-war development, taking into account the typology of territories and their compliance with the basic conditions and opportunities for development, as well as the degree of destruction as a result of hostilities.
Publisher
SHEI Ukrainian State University of Chemical Technology
Reference15 articles.
1. 1. Updated Ukraine Recovery and Reconstruction Needs Assessment (2023). www.worldbank.org. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2023/03/23/updated-ukraine-recovery-and-reconstruction-needs-assessment [in English].
2. 2. Plan vidnovlennia Ukrainy (2023). Viziia Vidnovlennia Ukrainy: "Sylna yevropeiska kraina - mahnit dlia inozemnykh investytsii" [Vision of the Restoration of Ukraine: "A strong European country is a magnet for foreign investments"]. recovery.gov.ua. Retrieved from https://recovery.gov.ua/ [in Ukrainian].
3. 3. Zablodska, I., Rohozian,Yu., Khandii, O., Sieriebriak. S., & Litvinova, I. (2023). European experience in the construction of priority development territories after an armed conflict: a trajectory of sustainability. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 18(1), 51-60. DOI: 10.35784/pe.2023.1.05 [in English].
4. 4. Boichenko, E., & Martynovych, N. (2023). Investment attractiveness of Territories in the context of restoring and stimulating the development of the post-war economy of Ukraine. Proceedings of the Modern trends in the development of financial and innovation-investment processes in Ukraine. (Ukraine, Vinnytsia, March 2-3, 2023), Vinnytsia: VNTU, 211-213 [in English].
5. 5. Hrechana, S. I. (2022). Sotsialno-ekonomichna efektyvnist rozvytku hromad i rehioniv: pobudova systemy pokaznykiv v umovakh povoiennoho vidnovlennia [Socio-economic efficiency of the development of communities and regions: construction of a system of indicators in the conditions of post-war recovery]. Ekonomika ta pravo - Economics and Law, 4, 43-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2022.04.043 [in Ukrainian].