Innovative Public-legal Regimes: what Makes them Innovative? Some Initial Thoughts

Author:

Degtyarev M. V.1

Affiliation:

1. Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)

Abstract

The article is devoted to the issues of determining the content and ontology of innovative public-legal regimes. The author gives the author’s concept of legal understanding and interpretation of the concept of “legal regime”.Key questions raised in the article — what specifically gives grounds to consider one or another public-legal regime as innovative. What is the core of the novelty in the ontology that allows us to talk about it?The article emphasizes that today a great many definitions of the concept of “innovation” are known and used, but most of them in relation to public-legal regimes do not provide any clear meaningful characteristics.Glancing at the topic of innovation in the regulatory space, the author concludes that a legal innovation can be: 1) a fundamentally new regulatory solution in the form of a proposal for legislative changes; 2) a fundamentally new law enforcement procedure, an algorithmic chain; 3) a new law enforcement approach; 4) a new legal principle intended for embedding in the activities of public administration bodies; 5) a new paradigm in operating regulatory tools, goals, results, benefits.The author declares the article as posing a scientific problem, but at the same time the author offers a conceptual answer to the above questions.

Publisher

Kutafin Moscow State Law University

Subject

General Medicine

Reference24 articles.

1. Aristov E. V., Kuznetsova O. A. K voprosu o formirovanii i razvitii prava robotov (pravovogo regulirovaniya robototekhniki) // Nauka i obrazovanie: khozyaistvo i ekonomika; predprinimatel'stvo; pravo i upravlenie. — 2018. — № 8. — S. 58—62.

2. Bakhrakh D. N. Administrativnoe pravo Rossii : uchebnik dlya vuzov. — M. : Norma ; Infra-M, 2000.

3. Bakhrakh D. N., Rossinskii B. V., Starilov Yu. N. Administrativnoe pravo : uchebnik dlya vuzov. — 2-e izd., izm. i dop. — M. : Norma, 2005. — 800 s.

4. Efremov A. A. Problemy eksperimental'nogo normotvorchestva v sfere tsifrovykh innovatsii // Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYuA). — 2019. — № 12. — S. 53—60.

5. Ershova I. V., Petrakov A. Yu., Tsimerman Yu. S. Doktrina innovatsionnogo prava na sluzhbe tsifrovogo prava // Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYuA). — 2020. — № 11. — S. 191—201.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3