Modern Possibilities and Limits of Artificial Intelligence Introduction into the Justice System

Author:

Makutchev A. V.1

Affiliation:

1. Tolstoy Tula State Pedagogical University

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are gradually becoming a part of our everyday life. From the category of elements of science fiction, they have moved into the category of elements of public administration, law enforcement, technology, and culture. The study is devoted to the problems of using AI in the system of justice. The author identifies current opportunities for implementing AI in court proceedings, explores the world experience and the content of discussions about the limits of such implementation. As a result of generalization of the existing ideas about the use of AI in justice, three concepts are identified — conservative, extensive and intensive, each of which represents the future of the judicial system in its own way regarding the development of information technologies. The conservative concept is focused on deepening digitalization of the judicial system and development of electronic justice. The extensive concept implies limited use of AI in the justice system without its direct participation in decision-making, but only with the aim of facilitating the work of judges. The intensive concept involves in-depth implementation of AI in the justice system, when AI either works on a par with a judge, or, more or less, replaces the judge.

Publisher

Kutafin Moscow State Law University

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference26 articles.

1. Amiyants K. A., Chemerinskiy K. V. Ispolzovanie iskusstvennogo intellekta v sovremennoy sudebnoy sisteme i prava cheloveka // Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk. — 2019. — № 11–3. — S. 49–52.

2. Afanasev A. Yu. Iskusstvennyy intellekt ili intellekt subektov vyyavleniya, raskrytiya i rassledovaniya prestupleniy: chto pobedit? // Biblioteka kriminalista. — 2018. — № 3 (38). — S. 28–34.

3. Biryukov P. N. Iskusstvennyy intellekt i «predskazannoe pravosudie»: zarubezhnyy opyt // Lex russica. — 2019. — № 11 (156). — S. 79–87.

4. Zakirov R. F. Ispolzovanie sovremennykh IT-tekhnologiy kak sredstvo dostizheniya osnovnykh zadach sudoproizvodstva // Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa. — 2018. — № 1. — S. 211–219.

5. Zaloilo M. V., Pashentsev D. A. Natsionalnyy pravoporyadok v Rossii v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo. — 2019. — T. 10. — № 2. — S. 196–209.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Application of Artificial Intelligence in Justice: Current Trends and Future Prospects;Human-Centric Intelligent Systems;2024-05-18

2. Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Criminal Procedural Proving;Journal of Digital Technologies and Law;2023-06-20

3. Software Agents in the Practice of Law;Actual Problems of Russian Law;2023-03-27

4. The Impact of Digitalization on the Exercise of Judicial Power in the Russian Federation;Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences;2023-01-27

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3