The Doctrine of Subrogation and the Specifics of its Interaction with Regression in Russian and Foreign Law

Author:

Kosov A. I.1

Affiliation:

1. Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)

Abstract

The author examines the doctrine of subrogation in historical and comparative legal aspects. The paper analyzes the interaction of the rules on subrogation and regression and examines the cases of applying the rules on subrogation to regression claims. The interaction between regression and subrogation is not limited to the default use of one or another model, depending on the normative regulation of the legal institution. This concerns the application of the nemo subrogat contra se principle to impose the prohibition to act to the detriment of the creditor under the main obligation in case of its partial fulfillment, the possibility of transferring recourse obligations to other persons through the subrogation mechanism. In some cases, the fulfillment of a recourse obligation may result in the subrogation of the regressant’s rights to the regredient. The author analyzes the choice of the legislator in terms of the model of the reverse claim in surety and insurance. It is indicated that in a situation where the rule of law does not allow the executor to exercise the rights of the creditor through subrogation, he is given the opportunity to reimburse his expenses through recourse. Regression in this regard does not mean an improvement in the position of such a person, but allows an individual to protect his interest where, for formal reasons, he does not have other legal means, which fully corresponds to the regime of a subsidiary remedy. The paper elucidates the arguments for and against the ability of the executor to independently choose the model of the reverse claim. It is concluded that de lege ferenda there are grounds for the executor in a number of cases (primarily with a joint obligation) to independently choose a model of a reverse claim, if this is not carried out to the detriment of the interests of the debtor and third parties.

Publisher

Kutafin Moscow State Law University

Reference35 articles.

1. Arkhipova A. G. Subrogatsiya v lichnom strakhovanii: sokhranenie zapreta ili ustranenie ogranicheniy? // Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii. — 2021. — № 4. — S. 98–119.

2. Baron Yu. Sistema rimskogo grazhdanskogo prava. Vypusk tretiy. Kn. IV: Obyazatelstvennoe pravo / perevel s pyatogo nemetskogo izdaniya L. Petrazhitskiy. — 2‑e izd. (ispravl. po 9‑mu nem. izd.). — SPb.: Tipografiya M. M. Stasyulevicha, 1899. — VIII. — 260 s.

3. Novitskiy I. B. Grazhdanskiy kodeks: prakticheskiy kommentariy / pod red. A. M. Vinavera i I. B. Novitskogo. — M.: Pravo i zhizn, 1924. — 35 s.

4. Vindsheyd B. Ob obyazatelstvakh po rimskomu pravu / per. s nem. pod red. i s primech. red.-izd. «Sudebnogo vestnika» A. B. Dumashevskogo. — SPb.: Tipografiya A. Dumashevskogo, 1875. — XXII. — 593 s.

5. Godeme E. Obshchaya teoriya obyazatelstv: per. s fr. — M.: Yurid. izd-vo MYu SSSR, 1948. — S. 470–478.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3