Features of the Comprehensive Method of Regulation of Genomic Research

Author:

Kubyshkin A. V.1

Affiliation:

1. Advocate's Office ‘SanctaLex’ of the Moscow City Bar Association

Abstract

This paper represents an attempt by the author to formulate the need for comprehensive regulation of genomic research. The essence of genomic research can be considered through categories such as metascience, synergy, and convergence. Further the article analyzes the various forms of scientific cooperation in this area, in the aims of illustrating the social relations in the field of genomic research, and to highlight their interdisciplinarity and complexity. With reference to the aforesaid social relations, the author proposes the possibility of using a special integrated regulator to govern genomic research, including not only legal, but also ethical and moral norms. The author analyzes a broad range of ethical issues which may arise in the course of genomic research. Conclusions are then drawn with regard to the mechanisms of regulating genomic research by means of the symbiotic method. The article further discusses the relationship of this method with other methods of regulating social relations, suggesting the use of blockchain technology as one of the elements of regulation in the field of genomic research.

Publisher

Kutafin Moscow State Law University

Reference24 articles.

1. Alekseeva, I.Yu., & Arshinov, V.I. (2016). Information society and NBICS-revolution. Moscow: Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russ.).

2. Arshinov, V.I. (2011). Synergy converges with complexity. Voprosy filosofii, (4), 73–84. (In Russ.).

3. Ashcroft, R.E. (2007). Human rights and ethics in genomic research: rethinking the model. Pharmacogenomics, 8(4), 391–395. https://doi.org/10.2217/14622416.8.4.391

4. Baksanskiy, O. E. (2016). Megascience: convergence methodology. Vestnik Vologodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: gumanitarnye, obshchestvennye, pedagogicheskie nauki, 3(3), 20–24. (In Russ.)

5. Budanov, V.G. (2006). Methodology and principles of synergetics. Philosophy of Education, 1(3), 143–172. (In Russ.)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3