Constitutional Models and Judicial Protection of Human Rights in Ecology in the Context of Global Climate Change (Foreign Experience)

Author:

Dudko I. G.1

Affiliation:

1. Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)

Abstract

The author refers to the foreign experience of constitutional and legal regulation in the field of ecology and the urgent problem of human rights protection in the conditions of climate change. A comparative analysis of the texts of the constitutions testifies to the recognition of the relationship of human rights with the environment; «a favorable environment» is declared as a constitutional goal. The author determines two main constitutional models. Within the framework of the first model, the right to the environment («favorable», «healthy», «balanced») is enshrined as an separate human right. The second model declares the right to life, health and other rights of the individual in an environment that meets the requirements of «favorable». The climate agenda as an urgent requirement of modern international law is reflected in the national law of States. Over the past 30 years, there has been a steady trend in the growth of individuals’ claims and their associations to executive authorities in connection with the onset of adverse effects from climate change. The analysis of judicial practice indicates the formation of two types of «climate» cases. The first group concerns protection of specific human rights (the right to life, the right to health, the right to property) violated due to ineffective measures of state bodies in combating the negative consequences associated with climate change. The second type of «climate» cases includes cases challenging regulatory and other acts (for example, permits for the construction of facilities whose operation will increase greenhouse gas emissions). The causes of action concern the need to change (cancel) acts in order to establish stricter limits on greenhouse gas emissions or in the adoption of special programs to combat climate change. The author draws the conclusion about a more successful practice of protecting rights within this type of «climate» cases.

Publisher

Kutafin Moscow State Law University

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences

Reference8 articles.

1. Abezin DA, Anisimov AP. Human rights in the context of climate change. Modern Law. 2015;10:5-10. (In Russ.).

2. Bogdanova NA. Modern catalogue of basic Human rights: international and national ways of filling. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 11. Law. 2010;1:41-57. (In Russ.).

3. Broslavskiy LI. Ecology and environmental protection: Laws and realities of the USA and Russia. Moscow: Infra-M Publ.; 2013. (In Russ.).

4. Constitutions of foreign states. 2nd ed. Moscow: Beck Publ.; 1997. (In Russ.).

5. Ermakova EP. Lawsuits against governments and private companies of European countries over climate protection under the Paris agreement 2015 (UK, Netherlands, Germany and France). Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2020;49:609-611. (In Russ.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3