Family Values under the Auspices of Law: The New in Tradition and Tradition in the New

Author:

Tarusina N. N.1

Affiliation:

1. Demidov Yaroslavl State University

Abstract

The paper analyzes prerequisites for the formation, content, types, methods of ensuring and protecting traditional family values that have been consolidated at the constitutional level with their subsequent implementation in the principles of family legislation, as well as in its key institutions and structures, namely: marriage, family, parenthood, childhood. Within each of them, the author determines gaps, unsettled relations, as well as decisions that do not meet the meaning of the latest constitutional amendments. The paper provides an assessment of typical and atypical doctrinal approaches to the diversity of significant family values, in particular the idea of auxiliary (peripheral) elements, including elements that are located in the «gray zone». Particular attention is paid to the compliance of the normative-legal structure of marriage and the family union related to it (actual marriage), parenthood, and the status of the child. The latter, taking into account the constitutional provision on the need to educate children in respect for elders, explicitly requires the addition of its content with elements of their duty (duties) under family law. It is suggested that there is a need to return to the idea of judicial specialization in family cases based on the actualization of attention to family problems, the state’s attitude to system protection and protection of its interests. The paper examines the problems of implementing the principle of family autonomy, protecting its sovereignty from arbitrary interference, ensuring the possibility of self-regulation, and emphasizes the need to maintain harmony between the independence of the family union and public control (prevention of deviant family development and response to factors and actions that destroy it).

Publisher

Kutafin Moscow State Law University

Subject

General Medicine

Reference45 articles.

1. Alekseev SS. Obshchaya teoriya prava [General theory of law]. Vol. 2. Moscow; 1982. (In Russ.).

2. Belova DA. Soglasie na primenenie metoda iskusstvennoy reproduktsii i ego pravovoe znachenie dlya ustanovleniya proiskhozhdeniya rebenka [Consent to the use of artificial reproduction and its legal significance for establishing the origin of the child]. Lex russica. 2020;8:21-31. (In Russ.).

3. Bespalov YuF. K voprosu o semeynykh tsennostyakh v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [On family values in the Russian Federation]. Family and Housing Law. 2018;5:4-6. (In Russ.).

4. Bondar NS. «Vechnye» konstitutsionnye idealy: naskolko oni neizmenny v menyayushchemsya mire? [«Eternal» constitutional ideals: how unchangeable are they in a changing world?]. Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2020;6:20-34. (In Russ.).

5. Borovikovsky A. Otchet sudji. Tom vtoroi [The judge’s report. Vol. 2.]. St. Petersburg; 1892. (In Russ.).

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3