Decentralized Autonomous Organizations in the System of Modern law: Towards the Problem Statement

Author:

Sidorenko E. L.1

Affiliation:

1. MGIMO University

Abstract

The paper examines the issues of adaptability of legal structures to the needs of the digital economy from the angle of analyzing the status of decentralized autonomous organizations. It reveals key trends in the development of blockchain technologies, reveals deep systemic connections between the needs and instrumental © Сидоренко Э. Л., 2024capabilities of civil law in the digital age. The refrain in the article is the idea that the digital economy throws new challenges to the legislator and generates previously unknown forms of business process organization, to which the law simply does not have time to respond, and it is forced to look for new methodological solutions. One such solution is to regulate the status of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAO) as an alternative to traditional corporations. Among the legally significant signs of DAO, the nature of the interaction of participants based on a distributed registry system, the absence of a single management body, automated execution of decisions, etc. is noted. Based on the concept of functional equivalence, the author examines the existing models of DAO legal regulation and highlights their common legal properties, which in the future allow us to propose a universal matrix of regulation of decentralized societies. The paper also evaluates the prospects for the «implantation» of DAO into the Russian legal field and draws conclusions about the instrumental and conceptual inability of civil law to offer a legal matrix of DAO that meets modern economic and digital demands.

Publisher

Kutafin Moscow State Law University

Reference12 articles.

1. Harris R. A new understanding of the history of limited liability: an invitation for theoretical reframing. Journal of Institutional Economics. 2020;16(5):643-664. DOI: 10.1017/S1744137420000181.

2. Hubbell SP. Neutral Theory in Community Ecology and the Hypothesis of Functional Equivalence. Functional Ecology. 2005;19(1):66-172. DOI: 10.1111/j.0269-8463.2005.00965.x.JSTOR 3599285.

3. Kucherov II, Povetkina NA, editor. The digital essence of financial law: past, present, future. Moscow: IZiSP, Yurisprudentsiya Publ.; 2022. (In Russ.).

4. Laptev VA, Chucha SYu, Feizrakhmanova DR. Digital transformation of management tools of modern corporations: the state and ways of development. Law enforcement. 2022;1:231-234. (In Russ.).

5. Latyshev LK. Translation course: Translation equivalence and ways to achieve it. Moscow; 1981. (In Russ.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3