Family Agreements in Private International Law

Author:

Voitovich E. P.1

Affiliation:

1. Siberian Institute of Management (Branch of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation)

Abstract

The problem of family agreements is not new to Russian jurisprudence, but it has not lost its relevance for many years. Attention to the issue is shown by representatives of both family and international private law. Nevertheless, there are no comprehensive studies, although the need for the development of conflict-of-laws norms exists not only in theory, but also in practice. Thus, general conflict-of-laws issues concerning permissible ways of determining competent law need to be resolved, various types of family agreements need to be implemented in practice and to be recognized in foreign jurisdictions. The author substantiates that taking into account the interests of participants in a family legal relationship is best implemented within the framework of the choice of the law to be applied by the parties to the agreement. At the same time, the author expresses concern that third parties remain beyond the conflict-of-laws choice. Thus, ensuring their interests within the framework of the agreements reached has reasonable doubts. When determining the status of a family agreement in the absence of a conflict of laws choice of the parties, the author suggests paying attention to the shortcomings and gaps of existing conflict of laws regulations for those parties to family agreements who are undoubtedly able to conclude such agreements. Expanding the range of family agreements and the possibility of their conclusion between different family members requires, in the author’s opinion, not only their regulatory support that would include conflict-of-laws regulations taking into account the interests of their participants and third parties, but also rules on recognition and enforcement encouraging quick and effective settlement of a cross-border family case, as well as proving their status and the rights and obligations that follow herewith. In the light of the main directions of improving the family legislation of Russia, it is proposed to update conflict-of-laws decisions, to ensure a more tangible impact of recognition and enforcement mechanisms regarding the institution of Russian law under consideration.

Publisher

Kutafin Moscow State Law University

Subject

General Medicine

Reference14 articles.

1. Asoskov AV. Kollizionnoe regulirovanie dogovornykh obyazatelstv [Conflict of laws regulation of contractual obligations]. Moscow: M-Logos; 2017. (In Russ.).

2. Asoskov AV. Osnovy kollizionnogo prava [Fundamentals of conflict of laws]. Moscow: M-Logos; 2017. (In Russ.).

3. Zasemkova OF. Sverkhimperativnye normy mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava: ponyatie, priznaki, praktika primeneniya: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Superimperative norms of private international law: concept, signs, practice of application: Cand. Sci. (Law) Thesis]. Moscow; 2017. (In Russ.).

4. Kontsevoy GV. Alimentnye obyazatelstva v mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Alimony obligations in private international law: Cand. Sci. (Law) Thesis]. Saratov; 2015. (In Russ.).

5. Mikheeva LYu. Perspektivy razvitiya semeynogo prava na rubezhe desyatiletiy [Prospects of Family Law Development at the turn of Decades]. Family and Housing Law. 2020;3:3-5. (In Russ.).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. International Family Law: Quo Vadis?;Actual Problems of Russian Law;2023-02-20

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3