IMMIGRATION POLICY AND INTEGRATION OF MIGRANTS IN THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK AT THE BEGINNING OF THE XXI CENTURY
-
Published:2022
Issue:2
Volume:14
Page:98-114
-
ISSN:2310-0524
-
Container-title:Baltic Region
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Balt. Reg.
Author:
Kapitsyn Vladimir M.1ORCID, Magomedov Arbahan K.2ORCID, Shaparov Alexander E.3ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Lomonosov Moscow State University 2. Russian State University for the Humanities 3. Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M. V. Lomonosov
Abstract
Denmark upholds high standards of human rights as long as the interests of its citizens are concerned but erects barriers for migrants with a dissimilar cultural background who might threaten the security of the national community. The Danish tradition of liberalism, humanism and the welfare state coexists with one of Europe’s most restrictive policies towards third-country immigrants. This article traces the evolution of management approaches to developing the immigration policy and integrating foreign cultural migrants in Denmark; the value determinants of these changes are described. Using the neo-institutional methodology, the authors analyse how the value determinants of Denmark’s immigration policy evolved and look at the national norms and practices of integrating migrants having a different cultural background. A restrictive immigration policy was made possible by a consensus between the main political forces — the left Social Democratic Party and the right Liberal Party Venstre, both willing to keep in check electoral support for the radical right-wing parties (the effect of ‘contagion from the right’ in Maurice Duverger’s terms). The object of Denmark’s restrictive integration policy is migrants with a different cultural background (mainly from Muslim countries). The government takes systematic measures to restrict their access to the country. As to migrant integration, the focus has shifted to ‘hard’ assimilation of civiс democratic values, benefits linked to employment, and deportation of migrants who have committed crimes.
Publisher
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),History,Cultural Studies,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference30 articles.
1. 1. Jørgensen, M. 2011, Understanding the research — policy nexus in Denmark and Sweden: The field of migration and integration, British Journal of Politics & International Relations, № 13 (1), p. 93—109. doi: 10.1111/j.1467856X.2010.00441.x. 2. 2. Jensen, K. K., Fernández, C., Brochmann, G. 2017, Nationhood and Scandinavian naturalization politics: varieties of the civic turn, Citizenship Studies, № 21 (5), p. 606—624. doi: 10.1080/13621025.2017.1330399. 3. 3. Scholten, P., Baggerman, F., Dellouche, L. et al. 2017, Policy Innovation in Refugee Integration? A Comparative Analysis of Innovative Policy Strategies toward Refugee Integration in Europe, Rotterdam: Erasmus Migration and Diversity Institute, 95 p. 4. 4. Olwig, K., Romme Larsen, B., Rytter, M.(eds.) 2013, Migration, Family and the Welfare State: Integrating Migrants and Refugees in Scandinavia, Routledge, 186 p. 5. 5. Brochmann, G., Hagelund, A. 2012, Immigration policy and the Scandinavian welfare state 1945—2010, Houndmills, Palgrave Macmillan, 297 p.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|