Affiliation:
1. Plekhanov Russian Economic University; Federal Research Center «Informatics and Control» of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Abstract
Despite the reason that is atypical for modern economic crises, the differentiation of Russian regions in terms of their socio-economic development in 2020 corresponded to the prevailing ideas about the factors of regional resilience. The degree of economic diversification of the regions and the level of their innovation potential were of key importance. As the result, the largest cities (Moscow and St. Petersburg) were in a relatively favorable position, where restrictions in certain types of activity were offset by an increase in demand for a number of complex services (in the IT sphere and others), the accelerated introduction of online formats of activity and remote employment. The specialization of the regional economy also mattered: the decline in the automotive industry was the highest, which is typical for crises. The general decline of the world economy hit the regions with large-scale extraction of fuel and energy resources. In 2020, the traditional factor of regional development was also significant – the capacity of sales markets, which also contributed to the growth of production in the largest cities and regions working for their markets and slowed down the development of manufacturing industries in the Far East. The border position of the regions did not have a clear impact on their development. It is assumed that the state anti-crisis policy allowed to slow down the decline in problem activities,while the increase in the production of goods and services in demanded activities was associated with the objective advantages of the territories.
Publisher
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
Reference19 articles.
1. 1. Barinova A.V., Zemtsov S.P. Inclusive growth and regional resilience in Russia. Region: Ekonomika i Sotsiologiya, 2019, no. 1, pp. 23–46. DOI: 10.15372/REG20190102 (In Russ.)
2. 2. Zhikharevich B.S., Klimanov V.V., Maracha V.G. Resilience of the territory: concept, measurement, governance. Regional’nyeIssledovaniya, 2020, no. 3, pp. 4–15. DOI: 10.5922/1994-5280-2020-3-1 (InRuss.)
3. 3. Zemtsov S.P., Mikhailov A.A. Trends and factors of development of small and medium-sized businesses in Russian regions during Сorona crisis. EkonomicheskoerazvitieRossii, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 34–45. (InRuss.)
4. 4. Zubarevich N.V. Influence the pandemic at socio-economic development and regional budgets. VoprosyTeoreticheskoyEkonomiki, 2021, no. 1, pp. 48–60. DOI: 0.24411/2587-7666-2021-10104 (InRuss.)
5. 5. Zubarevich N.V., Safronov S.G. Regions of Russia in the acute phase of the COVID crisis: differences from previous economic crises of the 2000s. Regional’nyeIssledovaniya, 2020, no. 2, pp. 4–17. DOI: 10.5922/1994-5280-2020-2-1 (InRuss.)
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献