Abstract
Nowadays, there is an active rethinking of the prospects for the development of physical education in educational institutions. This is manifested, in particular, in the aggravation of discussions about the expediency of using in our time such models of physical education as health-improving and adaptive, socially-oriented, personality-oriented, sports and recteative, which, as you know, differ in their goals and means of achieving them. In the course of these discussions, the proponents of some points of view reject the expediency of paying attention to the other approaches and offer their point of view as the "ultimate truth". In this work, an attempt is made to analyze the experience of getting out of similar situations in modern psychology and apply it to the field of physical education. The purpose of the study is to substantiate the expediency of using the principle of constructive alternativeism in physical education. Material and methods. In the process of research, the method of analysis and generalization of data from scientific and methodological literature was used. Results. The starting point of the study was the idea that approaches to the analysis of models of physical education should be carried out in the practical and theoretical planes. From a practical point of view, it is important to understand to what extent this or that model responds to the current demand of society, the complexity of organizational measures that are necessary for its implementation, the material base, etc. From the point of view of theory, the only thing that matters is to what extent our understanding of physical education as a phenomenon has been deepened and expanded. Conclusions. In the current conditions of martial law in Ukraine, the most expedient is the transition to a socially-oriented model of physical education. In the theory of physical education, it is advisable to focus on the principle of constructive alternativeism.
Publisher
National Pedagogical Dragomanov University
Reference14 articles.
1. Danayl S.N. (2013). Physical Education in the Context of Modern Developments in the Theory of Activity. Sportyvnyi visnyk Prydniprov᾽ia. (2):18-26.
2. State Requirements for the System of Physical Education of Children, Pupils and Students: nakaz Ministerstva osvity Ukrainy № 188; 1998, Trav. 25. 6 s.
3. Theory and Methods of Physical (za red. T. Yu. Krutsevych). Kyiv: Olimpiiska literatura; 2008. T. 1. 391 s.
4. Krutsevych T., Panhelova N., Moskalenko N. (2023). Physical Education in Educational Institutions: Current State and Present Realities. Sportyvnyi visnyk Prydniprovia. (1):67-74.
5. Prykhodko V.V. (2011). About the university discipline Physical Education, which still does not exist. Visnyk Chernihivskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu. Ser. Pedahohichni nauky. Fizychne vykhovannia ta sport: zb. nauk. pr. (1):370-4.