The Platonic-Biblical Origins of Apophatic Theology: Philo of Alexandria’s Philosophical Interpretation of the Pentateuchal Theophanies

Author:

Mrugalski DamianORCID

Abstract

This article examines Philo’s philosophical interpretation of the three theophanies in Exodus, which would, centuries later, continue to be considered by the great thinkers responsible for developing negative theology, such as Gregory of Nyssa and Dionysius the Areopagite. Although Exod 33:11 clearly states that the Lord spoke to Moses face to face, as if someone were to speak to his own friend, according to Philo, the lawgiver neither saw the face of God, nor learned the proper name of God, nor was he able to comprehend the essence of God. These very statements became the inspiration for later apophaticism. The present article seeks to establish to what extent Philo’s theses were influenced by Plato’s philosophy or by later Middle Platonism, and to what extent Philo, by commenting allegorically on the Pentateuch, becomes the initiator of new ideas hitherto unknown in philosophical discourse. In the course of the analyses, three great questions of apophatic theology are discussed: 1. the unnameability of God; 2. the unknowability of God’s essence; and 3. the knowability of God’s nature by grace.

Publisher

Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawla II

Subject

Religious studies

Reference73 articles.

1. Sources

2. Alcinous, Didaskalikos, in Alcinoos, Enseignement des doctrinesde Platon. Introduction, texte établi et commenté (ed. J. Whittaker; Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1990).

3. Apuleius, De deo Socratis, in Apulei Platonici Madaurensis Opera quae supersunt. III. De philosophia libri (ed. C. Moreschini; Berlin – Boston: B. G. Teubner 1991) 7-38.

4. Apuleius, De Platone et eius dogmate, in Apulei Platonici Madaurensis Opera quae supersunt. III. De philosophia libri (ed. C. Moreschini; Berlin – Boston: B. G. Teubner 1991) 87-145.

5. Cicero, De natura deorum, in Cicero, De natura deorum. Academica (trans. H. Rackham; Loeb Classical Library 268; Cambridge, MA – London: Harvard University Press 1979).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3