National self-governments in Hungary and Serbia in the context of public power decentralising solutions

Author:

Adamczyk AndrzejORCID

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to verify a thesis according to which countries which are considered to be the most representative examples of implementing the national cultural autonomy concept (Hungary and Serbia) in fact use the construct of national minority self-government, which, according to administrative law commentaries, is classified as non-territorial, or special self-government. In order to fulfill this task two decentralisation solutions which are aimed at pursuing national and ethnic minorities’ ambitions to maintain and enhance their cultural identity: national minority self-governments and national cultural autonomy has been presented. These legal constructs are not equivalent, although in international literature on the subject they are often treated as synonyms. In this context Serbian and Hungarian regulations has been presented and assessed.

Publisher

Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawla II

Subject

Development,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference61 articles.

1. Agopszowicz, Antoni, and Zyta Gilowska. Ustawa o samorządzie terytorialnym. Komentarz. Warszawa: C.H. Beck, 1997.

2. Antkowiak, Paweł. “Decentralizacja władzy publicznej w Polsce na przykładzie samorządu terytorialnego.” Środkowoeuropejskie Studia Polityczne, no. 2 (2011): 155–174.

3. Beretka, Katinka. “National Councils of National Minorities in Serbia: Pros and Contras of an Ethnic Self-Governance.” In The Challenge of Non-Territorial Autonomy. Theory and Practice, edited by Ephraim Nimni, Alexander Osipov and David J. Smith, 181–196. Oxford – Bern – Berlin – Bruxelles – Frankfurt am Main – New York – Wien: Peter Lang, 2013.

4. Bigo, Tadeusz. Związki publiczno-prawne w świetle ustawodawstwa polskiego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Kasy im. Mianowskiego, 1928.

5. Błachucki, Mateusz. “Przemiany ustrojowe samorządu specjalnego w polskim prawie administracyjnym.” In Prace Studialne Warszawskiego Seminarium Aksjologii Administracji. Szkice z zakresu procedury administracyjnej tom III, edited by Krzysztof Wąsowski and Katarzyna Zalasińska, 15–35. Kraków: Wydawnictwo WIT, 2014.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3