Abstract
Today, more than ever, the Internet and social media have become our primary sources of information, offering us a window to the world. However, this freedom to access and disseminate information has negative consequences, as it allows for a rapid spread of disinformation, propaganda, and hate speech. From the perspective of international human rights law, questions arise regarding the obligations and responsibilities of states. In this discussion, the authors argue that one of the primary tasks of states is to take necessary and appropriate measures to simultaneously protect the freedom of expression and prevent the spread of propaganda and disinformation. Balancing these conflicting interests is a complex challenge. To better understand them, the authors analyse selected examples from international and domestic jurisprudence and practice, such as the Rohingya genocide in Myanmar and the war in Ukraine. These cases serve to illustrate how state-sponsored propaganda and disinformation can lead to violence and result in grave human rights violations.
Publisher
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawla II
Reference31 articles.
1. Aliaksandrau A., Brave New War: The Information War between Russia and Ukraine, Index on Censorship 2014, vol. 43, no. 4.
2. Amnesty International Report 2021/22: The State of the World’s Human Rights, https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/pol10/4870/2022/en/ [access: 5.09.2023].
3. Asrat B., Prohibition of Force Under the UN Charter: A Study of Art. 2 (4), Uppsala 1991.
4. Baade B., Fake News and International Law, European Journal of International Law 2018, vol. 29, no. 4, DOI: 10.1093/ejil/chy071.
5. Bechtold E., Phillipson G., Glorifying Censorship? Anti-Terror Law, Speech, and Online Regulation, in: The Oxford Handbook of Freedom of Speech, eds. A. Stone, F. Schauer, Oxford 2021 [online edition: Oxford Academic, 10.02.2021], DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/