Abstract
Over the past decades, the European Union has beengradually developing and maintaining legal regionalism within its jurisdiction. Its purpose is to preserve the achievements of integration, as well as the unity and autonomy of EU law. In this paper, I recount the toolbox of EU legal regionalism from primary law, through the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, to the institution of the so-called disconnection clauses employed by the EU in certain international treaties, expanding also on their possible effects on international law and the Member States’ relations with third parties.
Publisher
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawla II
Reference13 articles.
1. Azoulai, Loic. “The Acquis of the European Union and International Organisations.” European Law Journal 11, no. 2 (2005): 196–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2005.00257.x.
2. Bartha, Ildikó. “Az Európai Közösség és tagállamok nemzetközi szerződéskötési hatáskörei az Európai Bíróság esetjogában” [“The International Treaty-Making Powers of the European Community and the Member States in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice”]. PhD diss., University of Miskolc, 2009.
3. Basedow, Johann Robert. “The Achmea Judgment and the Applicability of the Energy Charter Treaty in Intra-EU Investment Arbitration.” Journal of International Economic Law 23, no. 1 (2020): 271–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgz025.
4. Dawar, Kamala. “Disconnection Clauses: An Inevitable Symptom of Regionalism?.” Society of International Economic Law (SIEL), Second Biennial Global Conference, University of Barcelona, June 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1632433.
5. Kuijper, Pieter Jan. “The Conclusion and Implementation of the Uruguay Round Results by the European Community.” European Journal of International Law 6, no. 2 (1995): 228–9.