Erosion of the Principle of Mutual Recognition. European Arrest Warrant and the Principle of Mutual Recognition in the Light of the Recent CJEU Rulings

Author:

Sakowicz AndrzejORCID

Abstract

An effective implementation of mutual recognition in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice requires mutual trust between the Member State. Mutual trust has been eroded in some Member States due to the rule of law crisis. However, it is not only the rule of law crisis, but also the departure of the Member States from the shared values of respect for fundamental rights, as well as the differences in the prosecutorial systems of individual Member States, that have caused changes in the perception of the principle of mutual recognition. This paper will examine the evolving approach to the principle of mutual recognition based on the recent Court of Justice of the European Union rulings on the European arrest warrant. The analysis concludes that the CJEU attaches more importance to the protection of the principle of mutual recognition, the prosecution of perpetrators of crime, and the unwavering presumption of respect for fundamental rights by the Member states than to the effective protection of fundamental rights.

Publisher

Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawla II

Subject

Development,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference57 articles.

1. Alegre, Susie, and Marisa Leaf. “Mutual Recognition in European Judicial Cooper¬ation: A Step Too Far Too Soon? Case Study – the European Arrest Warrant.” European Law Journal 10, no. 2 (2004): 200–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1468-0386.2004.00212.x.

2. Anagnostaras, Georgios. “Mutual confidence is not blind trust! Fundamental rights protection and the execution of the European arrest warrant: Aranyosi and Caldararu.” Common Market Law Review 53, no. 6 (2016): 1675–1704. https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2016146.

3. Asp, Petter. “Mutual Recognition and the And the Development of Criminal Law Cooperation within the EU the EU.” In Harmonisation of Criminal Law in Europe, edited by Erling Johannes Husabø and Asbjørn Strandbakken, 23–40. Antwerpen–Oxford: Intersentia, 2005.

4. Bárd, Petra, and Wouter van Ballegooij. “Judicial Independence as a Precondition for Mutual Trust.” Verfassungsblog, April 10, 2018. Accessed February 23, 2023. https://verfassungsblog.de/judicial-independence-as-a-precondition-for -mutual-trust/.

5. Bárd, Petra, and Wouter van Ballegooij. “The AG Opinion in the Celmer Case: Why Lack of Judicial Independence Should Have Been Framed as a Rule of Law Issue.” Verfassungsblog, July 7, 2018. Accessed February 23, 2023. https://verfassungsblog.de/the-ag-opinion-in-the-celmer-case-why-lack-of-judicial-independence-should-have-been-framed-as-a-rule-of-law-issue.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3