Social Enterprises, Cooperatives or Benefit Corporations? On Reconciling Profit and the Common Good in Doing Business from a Polish Perspective

Author:

Dąbrowska JustynaORCID

Abstract

The aim of the article is to demonstrate that economic, technological and social changes, also thanks to the principle of sustainable development, lead to the transformation of existing and the emergence of new hybrid forms of conducting business activity. On one hand, there is a noticeable expansion of social economy mechanisms that reflect an ‘economic’ approach to providing broadly defined goods and services in the public interest, and there is also resurgence of democratic member-based organizations (DMOs), such as cooperatives with their dual nature and social and economic dimensions. On the other hand, traditional forms of for-profit business are transforming into entities that integrate social and environmental goals into business, known as Sustainability-Driven Hybrid Business Models (SHBMs), and of which benefit corporations (like U.S. Benefit Corporation or Social Purpose Corporation, Italian Societ. Benefit or French Soci.t. . mission) are an example. The transformation and emergence of these qualitatively new organizations is an illustration of the process of creative destruction described by Joseph Schumpeter. The article presents advantages and disadvantages associated with the benefit corporations. The analysis is concluded with the open question of whether legislative intervention is needed in this area, in particular whether it would be expedient to introduce ‘mission companies’ in Poland.

Publisher

Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawla II

Subject

Development,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference93 articles.

1. Bakeš, Milan, Marie Karfíková, Petr Kotáb, Hana Marková et al. Finanční právo. Praha: C. H. Beck, 2012.

2. Abramovay, Ricardo. Beyond the Green Economy. London: Routledge, 2015.

3. Altman, Jon C. “Sustainable development options on Aboriginal land: The hybrid economy in the twenty-first century.” Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research Publications, Discussion Paper No. 226 (2001): iii–14. Accessed November 10, 2022. https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/ 1885/40104/2/2001_DP226.pdf.

4. Ashoka. “About Ashoka”. Accessed November 10, 2022. https://www.ashoka.org/ en-us/about-ashoka.

5. Banerjee, Subhabrata Bobby. “Corporate Social Responsibility: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.” Critical Sociology 34, vol. 1 (2008): 51–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920507084623.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3