Mandatory Mediation in Family Disputes – An Emerging Trend in the European Union?

Author:

Korsakoviene IndreORCID,Branimirova Radanova JulijaORCID,Tvaronavičienė AgnėORCID

Abstract

The Mediation Directive (2008) obliged the Member States of the European Union to promote the use of mediation through their own means. A decade later, the results of several studies revealed that national efforts to foster mediation were not as effective as planned in most cases. Despite some scholars’ concerns about restricting mediation voluntariness as means for increasing its application, Italy introduced a mandatory mediation scheme which proved that forcing parties to mediate results in high numbers of mediation procedures with favorable success rates. This led other Member States to reconsider the role of the State in fostering mediation. This article tackles the prevalence of mandatory mediation in family disputes, as an area widely recognized as most suitable for it. The co-authors raised the research question of whether the introduction of mandatory mediation in family disputes is an emerging trend in the European Union. A short overview of the mandatory mediation concept and the existing doctrinal models was presented as a theoretical background of this research. Based on the review of the scientific literature, four prevailing models were identified and briefly described. Secondly, the map of mandatory mediation within the European Union was updated with the latest data collected from the most recent legislative amendments and testimonies of the corresponding national mediation experts. Thirdly, a brief examination of the current mandatory mediation models in the Member States was conducted. The in-depth analysis of the obtained results shows that introducing mandatory mediation in family disputes is a prevailing trend in fostering mediation in the European Union. Consequently, it was identified that the variety of implemented models went far beyond the existing doctrinal classification, which needs to be reconsidered by future research in this field.

Publisher

Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawla II

Subject

Development,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference51 articles.

1. “Commission report to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee on the application of Directive 2008/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters (COM(2016)0542).” Accessed January 10, 2023. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7–2011–0343_EN.html.

2. Alexander, Nadja. Global trends in mediation: riding the third wave, 2nd ed. Kluwer Law International, 2006.

3. Alexander, Nadja. International and Comparative Mediation: Legal Perspectives. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2009.

4. Andrews, Neil. “Mediation: International Experience and Global Trends.” Journal of International and Comparative Law 4, no. 2 (2017): 217–252.

5. Attorney-General’s Department (Australia). “The Resolve to Resolve – Embracing ADR to Improve Access to Justice in the Federal Jurisdiction: A Report to the Attorney-General.” September 15, 2009. Accessed February 5, 2023. https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2009–09/apo-nid67039.pdf.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3