Abstract
The article discusses Elisha Qimron’s suggestion that the syntagm חוק ומשפט וטהרה (B 52 = 4Q394 8 IV,2; 4Q396 1–2 II,3-4) from 4QMMT indicated the tripartite division of Jewish law in the understanding of the Qumran community. The first part presents the context of the use of חוק ומשפט וטהרה in 4QMMT, and briefly analyses the use of each of these terms in the literature of the Second Temple Period. The second part raises arguments refuting E. Qimron’s idea and proposes an alternative meaning of חוק ומשפט וטהרה.
Publisher
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawla II
Reference46 articles.
1. Altshuler, D., “On the Classification of Judaic Laws in the Antiquities of Josephus and the Temple Scroll of Qumran,” The Association for Jewish Studies Review 7/8 (1982/1983) 1–14.
2. Auld, A.G., I & II Samuel (Old Testament Library; Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox 2011).
3. Baumgarten, J.M., “The ‘Halakha’ in Miqṣat Maʿase ha-Torah (MMT),” Journal of the American Oriental Society 116 (1996) 512–516.
4. Bernstein, M.J., “The Employment and Interpretation of Scripture in 4QMMT: Preliminary Observations”Reading 4QMMT. New Perspectives on Qumran Law and History (eds. J. Kampen – M.J. Bernstein) (Symposium Series 2; Atlanta, GA: Scholar Press 1996) 29–51.
5. Berthelot, K., “4QMMT et la question du canon de la Bible hébraïque,” From 4QMMT to Resurrection. Mélanges qumrâniens en hommage à Émile Puech (eds. F. García Martínez – A. Steudel – E.J.C. Tigchelaar) (Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah 61; Leiden: Brill 2006) 1–14.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献