Abstract
Human conversational interaction is multimodal, involving both verbal and non-verbal modalities. That is, when a speaker and listener interact, they use not only spoken messages but also manual gestures. Manual gestures and spoken messages are semantically and temporally related and work together to create and express a complete meaning. This study employs a data-driven approach to investigate how L2 learners spontaneously employ gestures to express temporal concepts in ongoing dyadic interactions using 11 recorded interactions among L2 learners. The distribution and frequency of specific types of manual gestures were examined using sequential and gesture analyses. The results showed that, when representing temporal concepts, the participants produced language-redundant gestures. For example, to convey temporal concepts, they tended to co-express the same information with manual gestures, namely abstract deictic and metaphoric gestures, on an imaginary mental timeline axis, which appeared to represent the English grammatical concepts of tense and aspectual meaning. Regarding the functional differences in gestures in interactions, based on sequential analysis, speakers employed language-redundant gestures to express time concepts explicitly in comprehension sequences and in the negotiation of meaning as a strategy of repair for lexical retrieval, paraphrasing, and clarification. These findings reveal that understanding the use of both modalities, speech and gestures, is critical in uncovering how speakers conceptualize time in their minds and integrate space and time in language.
Publisher
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawla II
Reference33 articles.
1. Alibali, M. W., Young, A. G., Crooks, N. M., Yeo, A., Wolfgram, M. S., Ledesma, I. M., Nathan, M. J., Church, R. B., and E. J. Knuth. 2013. Students learn more when their teacher has learned to gesture effectively. Gesture 13(2): 210–233. https://doi.org.10.1075/gest.13.2.05ali
2. Bavelas, J., Gerwing, J., Sutton, C., and D. Prevost. 2008. Gesturing on the telephone: Independent effects of dialogue and visibility. Journal of Memory and Language 58(2): 495–520. https://doi.org.10.1016/j.jml.2007.02.004
3. Casasanto, D., and K. Jasmin. 2012. The hands of time: Temporal gestures in English speakers. Cognitive Linguistics 23(4): 643–674. https://doi.org.10.1515/cog-2012-0020
4. Cienki, A. 1998. Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric expressions. In J. P. Koenig (ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap, 189–204. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
5. de Ruiter, J. P., Bangerter, A., and P. Dings. 2012. The interplay between gesture and speech in the production of referring expressions: Investigating the tradeoff hypothesis. Topics in Cognitive Science 4(2): 232–248. https://doi.org.10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01183.x